Comparison Overview

TC Two Creative Studios

VS

STIPPICH | design

TC Two Creative Studios

Golden Hill, Fullerton, California, 92832, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The voice of your business is unique to you. Telling that story correctly, both with visuals and with dialogue is important. Your brand should be consistent - whether it be in print, online or through social media. It should even be reflected through the design of your workplace. I can help you do all that.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

STIPPICH | design

6679 W Sunflower Dr, Highland, Utah, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Stippich Design is a multi-disciplinary design firm owned and founded in 1987 by Linda Stippich. Linda founded the firm after working for a national design firm as Director of Graphics/Architectrual Signage Department. Based in Utah, Stippich Design's skill set extends across the full spectrum of graphics and identity, environmental graphic design, wayfinding, donor recognition, and art consulting.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tc-two-creative-studios.jpeg
TC Two Creative Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stippich-design.jpeg
STIPPICH | design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TC Two Creative Studios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
STIPPICH | design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TC Two Creative Studios in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STIPPICH | design in 2025.

Incident History — TC Two Creative Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TC Two Creative Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — STIPPICH | design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STIPPICH | design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tc-two-creative-studios.jpeg
TC Two Creative Studios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stippich-design.jpeg
STIPPICH | design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

STIPPICH | design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TC Two Creative Studios company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, STIPPICH | design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TC Two Creative Studios company.

In the current year, STIPPICH | design company and TC Two Creative Studios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither STIPPICH | design company nor TC Two Creative Studios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither STIPPICH | design company nor TC Two Creative Studios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither STIPPICH | design company nor TC Two Creative Studios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios company nor STIPPICH | design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios company nor STIPPICH | design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

STIPPICH | design company employs more people globally than TC Two Creative Studios company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TC Two Creative Studios nor STIPPICH | design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X