Comparison Overview

TBK Digital

VS

FIS

TBK Digital

Lahore, Pakistan, 54792, PK
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 700 and 749

At TBK Digital, we believe in building lasting relationships with our clients by understanding their unique challenges and goals. Whether you're a startup or an established business, our team is here to help you make a meaningful impact online.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

FIS

601 Riverside Ave, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, we’re a proud member of the Fortune 500® and the Standard & Poor’s 500® Index. Let's innovate together.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 45,534
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbk-digital.jpeg
TBK Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fis.jpeg
FIS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TBK Digital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FIS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TBK Digital in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FIS in 2026.

Incident History — TBK Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TBK Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tbk-digital.jpeg
TBK Digital
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Command Injection
Motivation: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, Proxying malicious traffic
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fis.jpeg
FIS
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FIS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TBK Digital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TBK Digital and FIS have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, FIS company and TBK Digital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FIS company nor TBK Digital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FIS company nor TBK Digital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FIS company nor TBK Digital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both TBK Digital company and FIS company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FIS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TBK Digital company.

FIS company employs more people globally than TBK Digital company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TBK Digital nor FIS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H