Comparison Overview

Taylor Corporation

VS

lipi marketing

Taylor Corporation

1725 Roe Crest Drive, None, North Mankato, MN, US, 56003
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Taylor provides a diverse set of products, services and technologies to power the potential of the world’s leading brands. Using the latest printed and digital methods, we facilitate marketing communications of all types for businesses and consumers across a wide range of industries. You’ll see our solutions in your mailbox, your email inbox, in retail settings and on your mobile device. Driven by Glen Taylor’s unwavering entrepreneurial spirit, Taylor Corporation has grown from a single small business in 1975 to one of the nation’s largest privately held companies today. What started as a humble printer of wedding invitations and business cards is now a highly diversified leader in the field of business communications. However, while Taylor's capabilities have changed dramatically in the last 45 years, our core purpose remains the same ― to create opportunity and security for our employees. Taylor also continuously invests in technologies and production methods that enable us to shrink our environmental footprint. This commitment shows in the way we divert tons of waste to energy production, source responsibly harvested forest products and work to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions year over year. The result is a culture of sustainability that guides our decision making and ensures that we take the long-term view in everything we do.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6,968
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

lipi marketing

600041, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-11

COMPANY 27 year old business group that has made a success story of every business it has been into. LIPI stands apart with its vision and a proactive approach to business. It has carved a niche for itself as a total solutions provider for the signage industry with superior infrastructure and a committed work force. VISION To achieve sustainable economic growth in society by supplying productive resources and creating employment opportunities, thereby ensuring better standards of living in the community. MISSION To create entrepreneur skills in the society and mould successful entrepreneurs by building competencies among them in technical, commercial, and managerial areas. ACHIEVEMENTS As an organization, over the last few years, LIPI expanded its operations by opening branches in India and overseas. In the process, LIPI acquired a few versatile products and diversified its product line. Now LIPI is equipped to provide wholesome signage solutions to the customers with a wide range of products and services. Remarkably, LIPI was able to accomplish its Vision and Mission to a great extent in a short time span since its inception. Majority of LIPI’s valued customers have grown with LIPI over the last few years. In addition to mentoring a group of successful business people, LIPI is still adding value to their business by supporting them with good service and latest products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylorcorporation.jpeg
Taylor Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lipi-marketing.jpeg
lipi marketing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taylor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
lipi marketing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for lipi marketing in 2025.

Incident History — Taylor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — lipi marketing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

lipi marketing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylorcorporation.jpeg
Taylor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lipi-marketing.jpeg
lipi marketing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

lipi marketing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Taylor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Taylor Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas lipi marketing company has not reported any.

In the current year, lipi marketing company and Taylor Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither lipi marketing company nor Taylor Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Taylor Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other lipi marketing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither lipi marketing company nor Taylor Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taylor Corporation company nor lipi marketing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Taylor Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to lipi marketing company.

Taylor Corporation company employs more people globally than lipi marketing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taylor Corporation nor lipi marketing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L