Comparison Overview

Taylor Walton LLP

VS

Dentons HPRP

Taylor Walton LLP

28-44 Alma Street, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 2PL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Taylor Walton Solicitors, is a prestigious multi-service, award-winning law firm, with offices in St Albans, Harpenden, and Luton. Our diverse clientele includes; individuals, families, FTSE100 and FTSE350 corporations, charities, as well as public and private sector organisations. What distinguishes us is our extensive experience, dedication, and complete commitment to serving our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dentons HPRP

Wisma 46 - Kota BNI, 32nd & 41st floor, Jakarta, DKI, 10220, ID
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hanafiah Ponggawa & Partners (HPRP) is one of Indonesia’s premier law firms engaged in a transnational practice. With roots in one of Indonesia’s first post-independence law firms, the Law Offices of Mr. L. Hanafiah, established in 1953, HPRP was reconstituted in 1990 before taking its present structure in 2004. The reorganization is also a reflection of HPRP’s clients’ need for specialized legal services in various areas of law. HPRP takes pride in the long-standing relationships which it builds and maintains with its clients. HPRP’s clients include multinational companies, large and small domestic companies, financial institutions, government agencies, local government, and individuals. We are proud of being an independent Indonesian law firm with high recognition from, and extensive connections in, the international community. Our history and current existence are evidence of our efforts in providing first class services to each and every client of HPRP.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-walton-llp.jpeg
Taylor Walton LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hanafiah-ponggawa-&-partners.jpeg
Dentons HPRP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taylor Walton LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dentons HPRP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Walton LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dentons HPRP in 2025.

Incident History — Taylor Walton LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Walton LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dentons HPRP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentons HPRP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-walton-llp.jpeg
Taylor Walton LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hanafiah-ponggawa-&-partners.jpeg
Dentons HPRP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Taylor Walton LLP company and Dentons HPRP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Dentons HPRP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Taylor Walton LLP company.

In the current year, Dentons HPRP company and Taylor Walton LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dentons HPRP company nor Taylor Walton LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dentons HPRP company nor Taylor Walton LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dentons HPRP company nor Taylor Walton LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP company nor Dentons HPRP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Dentons HPRP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Taylor Walton LLP company.

Dentons HPRP company employs more people globally than Taylor Walton LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taylor Walton LLP nor Dentons HPRP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X