Comparison Overview

Taylor Martin Recruitment

VS

Manpower

Taylor Martin Recruitment

Ground Floor Chiltern House, St Nicholas Court, 25 to 27 Castle Gate, Nottingham., Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG1 7AR, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-12 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://www.tmrecruitmentgroup.co.uk/

Excellent

Our business is all about finding and placing the right people in the right jobs. Whether it is a volume recruitment requirement or an occasional staffing need, our experienced team can help. Working together with our on-site consultants who operate locally and nationally, we can completely manage the recruitment process from end to end on your behalf, leaving you to focus on your core business. Our contract managers are deployed in-line with your shift requirements twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week providing total cover for your business. Our core areas of expertise are in construction, food manufacturing and processing, warehouse and logistics, technical and engineering and administration and general operatives.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Manpower

100 Manpower Place, None, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53212
Last Update: 2025-08-13 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
https://www.manpower.com

Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access to the people they need, faster. We effectively assess and develop skills, keeping our associates ahead of the curve, so they can get the jobs done each time, every time.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 28,793
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-martin-recruitment.jpeg
Taylor Martin Recruitment
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpower-.jpeg
Manpower
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Taylor Martin Recruitment
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Manpower
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Martin Recruitment in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

Manpower has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Taylor Martin Recruitment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Martin Recruitment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Manpower (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manpower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-martin-recruitment.jpeg
Taylor Martin Recruitment
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpower-.jpeg
Manpower
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Taylor Martin Recruitment company and Manpower company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Manpower company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Taylor Martin Recruitment company has not reported any.

In the current year, Manpower company has reported more cyber incidents than Taylor Martin Recruitment company.

Manpower company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Taylor Martin Recruitment company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Manpower company nor Taylor Martin Recruitment company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Manpower company nor Taylor Martin Recruitment company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taylor Martin Recruitment company nor Manpower company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taylor Martin Recruitment company nor Manpower company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Manpower company employs more people globally than Taylor Martin Recruitment company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References