Comparison Overview

Taylor Made Labels

VS

Micropress Printers Ltd

Taylor Made Labels

17252 Pilkington Road, Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.taylormadelabels.com

With over 35 years in business, Taylor Made Labels has long been a leader of innovation in the world of pressure sensitive label printing. Today, we are happy to include digital printing, 9 color flexo printing, specialty printing including foil stamping and embossing, environmentally friendly printing, and wine label printing among the printing techniques that help us produce the most eye-catching labels for our clients. We also can help solve your labeling equipment needs, with experts on staff and in the field to help with your application and variable printing needs. No matter how simple or how complicated, Taylor Made Labels has the "can do"​ attitude and experience you’re looking for.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Micropress Printers Ltd

Fountain Way, Reydon, IP18 6SZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.micropress.co.uk

Established more than 40 years ago, Micropress Printers are an award winning family business offering clients’ throughout the UK and Europe a high quality, reliable print and print finishing service at highly competitive prices and with a very low carbon footprint. We specialise in litho print of books, magazines, catalogues, brochures and leaflets. Our state-of-the-art Heidelberg litho presses with Inpress colour management ensure colour consistency and Xerox iGen 150 digital press meet the needs of clients from greetings cards right through to multi-page catalogues and everything in between. From a single copy right up to print runs of a million plus. Additionally, we offer print finishing including lamination and UV, creasing and folding, guillotining and die cutting, wire stitching, perfect and PUR binding as well as an automated mailing line with polybagging, up to 4 inserts and inkjet addressing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-made-labels.jpeg
Taylor Made Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/micropress-printers-ltd.jpeg
Micropress Printers Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taylor Made Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Micropress Printers Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Made Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Micropress Printers Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Taylor Made Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Made Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Micropress Printers Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Micropress Printers Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-made-labels.jpeg
Taylor Made Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/micropress-printers-ltd.jpeg
Micropress Printers Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Taylor Made Labels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Micropress Printers Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Micropress Printers Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Taylor Made Labels company.

In the current year, Micropress Printers Ltd company and Taylor Made Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Micropress Printers Ltd company nor Taylor Made Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Micropress Printers Ltd company nor Taylor Made Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Micropress Printers Ltd company nor Taylor Made Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taylor Made Labels company nor Micropress Printers Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Taylor Made Labels company nor Micropress Printers Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Micropress Printers Ltd company employs more people globally than Taylor Made Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taylor Made Labels nor Micropress Printers Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References