Comparison Overview

Taylist Media

VS

Rheinwerk Computing

Taylist Media

55 Lowlands Road, Harrow, HA1 3AW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Taylist Media is the UK’s foremost media company for the kitchen, bedroom and bathroom sector with a portfolio of brands made up of two market-leading titles – kbbreview and Kitchens Bedrooms & Bathrooms. These brands have grown into an enviable selection of printed magazines, digital products and face-to-face events that combine to offer the sectors they serve the best possible mix of media solutions. They are all at the heart of the market and are so well established and highly respected that they have significant influence on their respective audiences. kbbreview has been the biggest and best B2B media brand in the kitchen, bedroom and bathroom sector for over 35 years. First published in 1984, kbbreview enjoys a unique relationship with its core readership of independent kitchen, bedroom and bathroom retailers. [www.kbbreview.com] Our consumer title Kitchens Bedrooms & Bathrooms celebrates 30 years in 2020, making it by far the longest-running newsstand title in the industry. It is also, by an independently verified measure, the best selling kitchen and bathroom title in the UK. [www.kbbmagazine.com]

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rheinwerk Computing

None, None, Boston, Massachusetts, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Rheinwerk Computing is an imprint of Rheinwerk Publishing, which was founded in Bonn, Germany in 1999. The publications are written by leading experts in the fields of programming, administration, security, analytics, and more. Each book is detailed and hands-on to help readers develop essential practical skills that they can apply to their daily work. For more information on the Rheinwerk Computing series of books, please visit www.rheinwerk-computing.com.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylist-media.jpeg
Taylist Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rheinwerk-computing.jpeg
Rheinwerk Computing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taylist Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rheinwerk Computing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylist Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rheinwerk Computing in 2025.

Incident History — Taylist Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylist Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rheinwerk Computing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rheinwerk Computing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylist-media.jpeg
Taylist Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rheinwerk-computing.jpeg
Rheinwerk Computing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rheinwerk Computing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Taylist Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rheinwerk Computing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Taylist Media company.

In the current year, Rheinwerk Computing company and Taylist Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing company nor Taylist Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing company nor Taylist Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rheinwerk Computing company nor Taylist Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taylist Media company nor Rheinwerk Computing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Taylist Media company nor Rheinwerk Computing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taylist Media nor Rheinwerk Computing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.