Comparison Overview

Tata Electronics

VS

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

Tata Electronics

Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tataelectronics.com/

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenfield venture of the Tata Group, the company aims to serve global customers through integrated offerings across a trusted electronics and semiconductor value chain.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 15,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk

Jakarta, Jakarta, ID, 12910
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.indofood.com

Over a number of decades PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk has been progressively transformed to become a Total Food Solutions company with operations in all stages of food manufacturing from the production of raw materials and their processing through to consumer products in the market. Today, it is renowned as a well–established company & a leading player in each category of business in which it operates. In its business operations, Indofood capitalizes on its resilient business model with 4 complementary Strategic Business Groups : Consumer Branded Products (CBP). Indofood CBP is one of the leading packaged food producers in Indonesia, with a wide range of packaged food products. ICBP product brands are among the strongest brands with the most significant mind share in Indonesia for consumer food brands. Bogasari, primarily a producer of wheat flour as well as pasta. Its business operations are supported by shipping and packaging units. Agribusiness. The Group’s principal business activities range from research and development, seed breeding, oil palm cultivation and milling; as well as the production & marketing of branded cooking oils, margarine and shortening. In addition, the Group is also involved in the cultivation and processing of rubber and sugar cane as well as other crops. Distribution, which boasts the most extensive distribution network in Indonesia, distributes the majority of Indofood’s and its subsidiaries’ consumer products as well as third–party products. Cultivation and Processed Vegetables activities are conducted by China Minzhong Food Corporation Limited (“CMFC”) which is listed on the SGX and is an integrated vegetable processing company in the People’s Republic of China. Through its decades of experience CMFC has developed an integrated demand-driven operation with wide-ranging cultivation and processing capabilities. In addition, CMFC also has a branded products operation.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 16,769
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-indofood-sukses-makmur-tbk.jpeg
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-indofood-sukses-makmur-tbk.jpeg
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tata Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tata Electronics company.

In the current year, PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company and Tata Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk company employs more people globally than Tata Electronics company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References