Comparison Overview

Tata Electronics

VS

Electrolux Group

Tata Electronics

Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tataelectronics.com/

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenfield venture of the Tata Group, the company aims to serve global customers through integrated offerings across a trusted electronics and semiconductor value chain.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 15,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Electrolux Group

Electrolux - Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, SE-10545
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
http://www.electroluxgroup.com

Electrolux Group is a leading global appliance company that has shaped living for the better for more than 100 years. We reinvent taste, care and wellbeing experiences for millions of people, always striving to be at the forefront of sustainability in society through our solutions and operations. Under our group of leading appliance brands, including Electrolux, AEG and Frigidaire, we sell household products in around 120 markets every year. In 2024 Electrolux Group had sales of SEK 136 billion and employed approximately 41,000 people around the world. For more information go to www.electroluxgroup.com Comment moderation guidelines: We welcome open, respectful and constructive conversation on this page. At Electrolux Group, our values of respect, dignity and courtesy guide how we engage online, and we ask that all contributions align with these principles and LinkedIn’s Community Guidelines and User Agreement. To ensure a safe and inclusive environment, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, offensive, disruptive, misleading or false, repetitive or off-topic. We may also block or report users who repeatedly violate these guidelines. Please note that comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of Electrolux Group.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 26,982
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electroluxgroup.jpeg
Electrolux Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electrolux Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Group in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electrolux Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electroluxgroup.jpeg
Electrolux Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Electrolux Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Electronics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Electrolux Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tata Electronics company.

In the current year, Electrolux Group company and Tata Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Electrolux Group company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor Electrolux Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Electrolux Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tata Electronics company.

Electrolux Group company employs more people globally than Tata Electronics company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Electrolux Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References