Comparison Overview

Tata Electronics

VS

Alpargatas S.A.

Tata Electronics

Sarjapur Road, Bengaluru, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenfield venture of the Tata Group, the company aims to serve global customers through integrated offerings across a trusted electronics and semiconductor value chain.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 15,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alpargatas S.A.

Av. das Nações Unidas, 14.261, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 04794-000
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We are a global company, founded and based in Brazil for over 115 years. We are committed to delight the world with amazing brands, that convey lightness and joy to the everyday lives of our consumers. We own Havaianas brand, world leader in open shoes, known for the iconic flip-flops that represent Brazilianness, comfort and style. We have 49.2% of Rothy’s a north-american sustainable footwear Brand. The Havaianas brand is one of the largest open-toe footwear brands in the world, with a significant presence and operation in dozens of countries. Rothy’s is present in the United States. Our growth is based on sustainability and economy, always valuing the socio-environmental responsibility of our operations. Our supply chain is vertical, with four manufacturing units in Brazil, and we own ioasys, our digital transformation company. We are more than 10 thousand employees, passionate about make it happen, who want to inspire the world to walk a lighter path. #WeAreAlpaLovers – Inspired by consumers and we walk together to make it happen!

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,977
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpargatas.jpeg
Alpargatas S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alpargatas S.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Electronics in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpargatas S.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alpargatas S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpargatas S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelectronicspvtltd.jpeg
Tata Electronics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpargatas.jpeg
Alpargatas S.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tata Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alpargatas S.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alpargatas S.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tata Electronics company.

In the current year, Alpargatas S.A. company and Tata Electronics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Tata Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics company nor Alpargatas S.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alpargatas S.A. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tata Electronics company.

Tata Electronics company employs more people globally than Alpargatas S.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Electronics nor Alpargatas S.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N