Comparison Overview

Tata Motors

VS

FORVIA HELLA

Tata Motors

Bypass Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411046
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.tatamotors.com

At the forefront of shaping mobility for over eight decades, driven by a legacy of innovation and an unwavering commitment to excellence. We fuse next-generation technologies with operational precision and continuous value creation — across every vehicle and process. But what truly sets us apart is our purpose: transforming lives, empowering communities, and building next-gen mobility solutions. Smart tech. Safer mobility. Greener journeys — creating a cleaner, more connected world and shaping a better future.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 72,259
Subsidiaries: 54
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

FORVIA HELLA

Rixbecker Strasse 75, Lippstadt, undefined, 59552, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hella.com

FORVIA HELLA is a listed international automotive supplier. As a company of the FORVIA Group, FORVIA HELLA stands for high-performance lighting technology and vehicle electronics and, with the Lifecycle Solutions Business Group, also covers a broad service and product portfolio for the spare parts and workshop business as well as for manufacturers of special vehicles. With currently around 36,500 employees at over 125 locations, the Company is active worldwide and generated adjusted sales of €8.1 billion on a preliminary basis in the fiscal year 2024. www.forvia-hella.com Legal notice: https://www.hella.com/legalnotice Data protection notice: https://www.hella.com/hella-com/en/Data-protection-65.html

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 16,961
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-motors.jpeg
Tata Motors
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Motors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FORVIA HELLA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Tata Motors has 233.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FORVIA HELLA in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FORVIA HELLA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FORVIA HELLA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-motors.jpeg
Tata Motors
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hella.jpeg
FORVIA HELLA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FORVIA HELLA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Motors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Motors company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas FORVIA HELLA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Motors company has reported more cyber incidents than FORVIA HELLA company.

Tata Motors company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while FORVIA HELLA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Motors company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other FORVIA HELLA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Motors company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while FORVIA HELLA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tata Motors company nor FORVIA HELLA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Motors company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FORVIA HELLA company.

Tata Motors company employs more people globally than FORVIA HELLA company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor FORVIA HELLA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References