Comparison Overview

Tata Motors

VS

Li Auto

Tata Motors

Bypass Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411046
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.tatamotors.com

At the forefront of shaping mobility for over eight decades, driven by a legacy of innovation and an unwavering commitment to excellence. We fuse next-generation technologies with operational precision and continuous value creation — across every vehicle and process. But what truly sets us apart is our purpose: transforming lives, empowering communities, and building next-gen mobility solutions. Smart tech. Safer mobility. Greener journeys — creating a cleaner, more connected world and shaping a better future.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 72,259
Subsidiaries: 54
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Li Auto

Number 11 of Wenliang Street, Shunyi District, None, Beijing, Beijing, CN, 101399
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.liauto.com

Li Auto Inc. is a leader in China's new energy vehicle market. The Company designs, develops, manufactures, and sells premium smart electric vehicles. Its mission is: Create a Mobile Home, Create Happiness (创造移动的家,创造幸福的家). Through innovations in product, technology, and business model, the Company provides families with safe, convenient, and comfortable products and services. Li Auto is a pioneer in successfully commercializing extended-range electric vehicles in China. While firmly advancing along this technological route, it builds platforms for battery electric vehicles in parallel. The Company leverages technology to create value for users. It concentrates its in-house development efforts on proprietary range extension systems, innovative electric vehicle technologies, and smart vehicle solutions. The Company started volume production in November 2019. Its current model lineup includes Li MEGA, a high-tech flagship family MPV, Li L9, a six-seat flagship family SUV, Li L8, a six-seat premium family SUV, Li L7, a five-seat flagship family SUV, and Li L6, a five-seat premium family SUV. The Company will continue to expand its product lineup to target a broader user base.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 1,666
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-motors.jpeg
Tata Motors
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/理想汽车.jpeg
Li Auto
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tata Motors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Li Auto
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Tata Motors has 233.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Li Auto in 2025.

Incident History — Tata Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Li Auto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Li Auto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tata-motors.jpeg
Tata Motors
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/理想汽车.jpeg
Li Auto
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Li Auto company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Motors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Motors company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Li Auto company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Motors company has reported more cyber incidents than Li Auto company.

Tata Motors company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Li Auto company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Motors company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Li Auto company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Motors company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Li Auto company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tata Motors company nor Li Auto company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Motors company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Li Auto company.

Tata Motors company employs more people globally than Li Auto company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tata Motors nor Li Auto holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References