Comparison Overview

Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG)

VS

Log Cabin Village

Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG)

Dunn Place, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery aims to provide, promote and facilitate interaction with, and understanding of, the cultural and natural world for present and future generations. The Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery collects, preserves, researches, displays, interprets and safeguards the physical evidence of the natural and cultural heritage of Tasmania, together with relevant material from interstate and overseas. The purpose of this collection is to provide present and future generations with the opportunity to gain information and insight into their world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Log Cabin Village

2100 Log Cabin Village Ln, Fort Worth, 76109, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The purpose of Log Cabin Village is to educate the public through the collection, preservation and interpretation of artifacts, representative structures, and other items of social and cultural significance to Texas’ pioneer era (1840-1890). Log Cabin Village aspires to build connections to 19th century Texas by providing educational opportunities and sensory experiences that are engaging, accurate, and as authentic as possible. We invite you to escape the present and experience the past… right here in the heart of Fort Worth. We can’t wait to see you here!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/log-cabin-village.jpeg
Log Cabin Village
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG)
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Log Cabin Village
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Log Cabin Village in 2026.

Incident History — Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Log Cabin Village (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Log Cabin Village cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tasmanian-museum-and-art-gallery-tmag-.jpeg
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG)
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/log-cabin-village.jpeg
Log Cabin Village
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Log Cabin Village company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Log Cabin Village company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company.

In the current year, Log Cabin Village company and Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Log Cabin Village company nor Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Log Cabin Village company nor Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Log Cabin Village company nor Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company nor Log Cabin Village company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company nor Log Cabin Village company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) company employs more people globally than Log Cabin Village company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) nor Log Cabin Village holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.