Comparison Overview

Target Studios

VS

Green Fox Studio

Target Studios

undefined, undefined, undefined, 95126, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

As Target Studios, Leo and partner Pat Jimenez have long served as the main marcom resource for start-up and smaller firms, supplemented the internal capabilities of major companies and provided creative-team support for full-service advertising and public relations agencies. Clients have ranged from firms such a Fresh Choice Restaurants, J. Lohr Winery, and Heritage Bank, to well-known, high-tech companies such as Network Appliance, Hitachi, and Veritas. Target also offers extensive experience in serving major real estate developers throughout California.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Green Fox Studio

undefined, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Green Fox Studio is the only one of its kind. We are an award-winning, full-service creative agency and social enterprise operating Australia’s first not-for-profit graphic design training studios inside prisons, detention centres, and in the community since 2018. Our mission is to eliminate disadvantage and its consequences—including crime and reoffending, marginalisation and exclusion, homelessness, mental illness, and unemployment. In our two-pronged approach, we deliver high-quality creative work to our corporate clients, while concurrently assisting marginalised people through our training studios, providing intervention, rehabilitation, and economic opportunity giving disadvantaged people a second chance at building a meaningful life. www.greenfoxstudio.com.au

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target-studios.jpeg
Target Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-fox-studio.jpeg
Green Fox Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Target Studios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Green Fox Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Target Studios in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green Fox Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Target Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Target Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Green Fox Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Fox Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target-studios.jpeg
Target Studios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-fox-studio.jpeg
Green Fox Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Target Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green Fox Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Green Fox Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Target Studios company.

In the current year, Green Fox Studio company and Target Studios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Green Fox Studio company nor Target Studios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Green Fox Studio company nor Target Studios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Green Fox Studio company nor Target Studios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Target Studios company nor Green Fox Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Target Studios company nor Green Fox Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Green Fox Studio company employs more people globally than Target Studios company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Target Studios nor Green Fox Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X