Comparison Overview

Target Labels and Packaging

VS

Digital Print Solutions (DPS)

Target Labels and Packaging

95 South River Bend Way, North Salt Lake, Utah, 84054, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We offer full service printing for labels, flexible packaging and shrink sleeves. We have two pouch machine for stand-up pouches, purchased new and faster converting equipment, as well as wide web slitters for high speed slitting. We have recently added new lamination capabilities for high speed lamination. Our most recent purchase places us among the elite of flexible packaging with a new wide web printing press. This press offers some of the most recent technological advances in flexible packaging. Our goal is to offer superior products at competitive prices. Digital packaging is also a large part of our business. We can provide for your short runs and extremely long runs at competitive pricing and lead times.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Digital Print Solutions (DPS)

9085 Freeway Dr S, Macedonia, Ohio, US, 44056
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Digital Print Solutions is a truly unique business with one clear objective in mind; to create and execute a client centered service and sales environment not seen in the production/office copier environment. Our philosophy is to use a combination of the latest technology, late model equipment, and in-place gear to provide both a cost effective and extremely flexible alternative to the long term leases that have become the norm in this industry. Our objective is to uncover how to most efficiently and cost effectively provide you winning solutions, not just to place the newest equipment available. DPS delivers creative solutions through flexible contract options, customized service plans and new business ideas that align commercial printers to areas of profitability and growth. DPS is Canon's largest production print dealership in America. We have the full suite of Canon products from digital presses to office copiers making DPS your total solution partner for your business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target-labels-and-packaging.jpeg
Target Labels and Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-print-solutions.jpeg
Digital Print Solutions (DPS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Target Labels and Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Digital Print Solutions (DPS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Target Labels and Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digital Print Solutions (DPS) in 2025.

Incident History — Target Labels and Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Target Labels and Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Digital Print Solutions (DPS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digital Print Solutions (DPS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target-labels-and-packaging.jpeg
Target Labels and Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digital-print-solutions.jpeg
Digital Print Solutions (DPS)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Target Labels and Packaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Target Labels and Packaging company.

In the current year, Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company and Target Labels and Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company nor Target Labels and Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company nor Target Labels and Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company nor Target Labels and Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging company nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging company nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Digital Print Solutions (DPS) company employs more people globally than Target Labels and Packaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Target Labels and Packaging nor Digital Print Solutions (DPS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N