Comparison Overview

Target Print & Mail

VS

L&S Printing Company

Target Print & Mail

2843 Industrial Plaza Drive, Tallahassee, FL, 32301, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.targetprintmail.com

Target Print & Mail (formerly Target Copy) is a full service printing and mailing company located in Tallahassee, Florida. Our clients are amazingly creative and challenge us everyday to be better at what we do. In return, we consistently go above and beyond to make sure we meet their needs. Target Print & Mail is locally- and family-owned, and is certified by both Leon County and the State of Florida as a Minority Business Enterprise.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

L&S Printing Company

Hazelwood Close, Worthing, West Sussex, BN14 8NP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ls-printing.com

The Craft of printing We have a strong heritage of producing and printing premium quality items for some of the country’s most well known organisations and institutions. From your concept to your artwork to your doorstep, your warehouse or your shop shelves We look after all your print production services under one roof. We streamline the print process by cutting out the middle men and all the unnecessary suppliers. You might want to take advantage of our online proofing and management services. We live and breathe production and printing We work 24/7 to take care of your time-critical tasks. We’re always at the other end of the phone to keep you up-to-date on your jobs progress, or you can track your project online. The cutting edge of print design We’re constantly increasing the speed and quality of the work we do for you by continually investing in state-of-the-art technologies. Come and visit us to have a look around.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target-copy.jpeg
Target Print & Mail
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&s-printing-company.jpeg
L&S Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Target Print & Mail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L&S Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Target Print & Mail in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&S Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Target Print & Mail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Target Print & Mail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L&S Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&S Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/target-copy.jpeg
Target Print & Mail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l&s-printing-company.jpeg
L&S Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Target Print & Mail company and L&S Printing Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, L&S Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Target Print & Mail company.

In the current year, L&S Printing Company company and Target Print & Mail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L&S Printing Company company nor Target Print & Mail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L&S Printing Company company nor Target Print & Mail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L&S Printing Company company nor Target Print & Mail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Target Print & Mail company nor L&S Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Target Print & Mail company nor L&S Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

L&S Printing Company company employs more people globally than Target Print & Mail company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Target Print & Mail nor L&S Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References