Comparison Overview

TANGRAM

VS

Wisefools

TANGRAM

12 Paulding Street Pleasantville, NY 10570, US
Last Update: 2025-03-10 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Tangram creates intelligent brand experiences that connect you with your customers. Designing for trade shows, retail environments and special events Tangram articulates modern culture through new forms at the intersection of art and technology. Tangram's international capabilities enable us to design and manage in your timeframe and deliver locally anywhere in the world, offering the best of both worlds: creativity delivered. Listed among the Top Fifty exhibit fabricators By Event Marketer Magazine, Tangram will help make your next exhibition an international success at home or abroad.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wisefools

Begijnhoflaan 87 Ghent, Flemish Region 9000, BE
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Wisefools is een experience design studio. En dan vooral voor food & beverages en fashion & lifestyle. Wij zorgen voor interacties die klikken met je klant en kloppen met je merk. Want jouw eindklant: daar begint het mee. Degene die jouw product eet, drinkt, smeert, koopt, draagt, beleeft. Die willen wij bij Wisefools begrijpen en mee krijgen in jouw verhaal. Hoe we dat doen, neem eens een kijkje op onze website. Show more Show less

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1 employee
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tangram-international-exhibitions-inc..jpeg
TANGRAM
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavagraphics.jpeg
Wisefools
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
TANGRAM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wisefools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TANGRAM in 2025.

Incidents vs Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wisefools in 2025.

Incident History โ€” TANGRAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TANGRAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Wisefools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wisefools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tangram-international-exhibitions-inc..jpeg
TANGRAM
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavagraphics.jpeg
Wisefools
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both TANGRAM company and Wisefools company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Wisefools company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TANGRAM company.

In the current year, Wisefools company and TANGRAM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wisefools company nor TANGRAM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wisefools company nor TANGRAM company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wisefools company nor TANGRAM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TANGRAM company nor Wisefools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TANGRAM company nor Wisefools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither TANGRAM company nor Wisefools company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.