Comparison Overview

Tanenholz & Marr

VS

Blue Dot Advocates, PBC

Tanenholz & Marr

11200 Rockville Pike, Suite 235, Rockville, MD, US, 20852
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Tanenholz & Marr is a Washington, D.C. based law firm specializing in all aspects of discovery, from initial consultation to the end-to-end management of large-scale document reviews. With years of big-firm litigation experience, Tanenholz & Marr understands that well-planned and high quality document review can both minimize litigation costs and maximize litigation efficiencies. Providing flexible teams of skilled contract attorneys led by experienced senior associates, Tanenholz & Marr is uniquely equipped to manage your discovery needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Blue Dot Advocates, PBC

1536 Wynkoop St, Denver, CO, 80202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Blue Dot Advocates, PBC (a public benefit cooperative) is a law firm that for almost a decade has focused on impact investing, social enterprise, and building the new business economy. Our lawyers have worked with clients on every one of the seven continents, and have assisted with impact capital transactions averaging $8-79 million year to year. Our social enterprise practice includes assisting clients with structuring and operating both for-profit and non-profit companies, and advising family offices, foundations, institutions, and other investors committed to investing in such entities. Our goal is to exclusively support ventures that are targeting issues related to income inequality, extreme poverty, renewable energy, and sustainable development. We are actively recruiting now, with an eye towards continuously developing a network of lawyers and specialists to provide the highest quality legal services to international social enterprises and impact investors. Our primary goal is to facilitate the flow of investment capital to financially scale-able social enterprises. Interested? Visit our website for more information on opportunities.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tanenholz-marr.jpeg
Tanenholz & Marr
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-dot-advocates.jpeg
Blue Dot Advocates, PBC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tanenholz & Marr
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blue Dot Advocates, PBC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tanenholz & Marr in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Dot Advocates, PBC in 2025.

Incident History — Tanenholz & Marr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tanenholz & Marr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blue Dot Advocates, PBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blue Dot Advocates, PBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tanenholz-marr.jpeg
Tanenholz & Marr
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-dot-advocates.jpeg
Blue Dot Advocates, PBC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tanenholz & Marr company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tanenholz & Marr company.

In the current year, Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company and Tanenholz & Marr company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company nor Tanenholz & Marr company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company nor Tanenholz & Marr company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company nor Tanenholz & Marr company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr company nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr company nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tanenholz & Marr company employs more people globally than Blue Dot Advocates, PBC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tanenholz & Marr nor Blue Dot Advocates, PBC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X