Comparison Overview

Tandemic

VS

Laboratoire Pacte

Tandemic

Oval Damansara, 685 Jalan Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, 60000, MY
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Tandemic is an innovation firm with teams based in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. We creates innovative approaches to tackle tough business and social challenges. Our work makes products, services, and interventions more meaningful to people. We provide training and consulting for people who want to do the same. We partner with organisations to make innovative and client-centred ways of working business as usual. We work with businesses, governments, and social organisations to create change. Our work spans 10 countries in Asia and Europe. Over 5,000 people across Asia have taken part in Tandemic training. Our team has designed new ways of preventing diabetes, new FMCG product experiences, and future-oriented approaches to improving education. We bring to the table deep expertise in a proven methodology rooted in design thinking and lean startup approaches.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Laboratoire Pacte

1030 av. centrale - Domaine Universitaire, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, 38400, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Pacte est une unité mixte de recherche (UMR 5194) en sciences sociales du CNRS, de Sciences Po Grenoble et de l’ Université Grenoble Alpes , répartie sur cinq sites géographiques différents en Rhône-Alpes. L’UMR réunit 120 chercheurs et enseignants-chercheurs permanents, 25 ingénieurs et techniciens et 150 doctorants. Elle rassemble les politistes, les géographes et les urbanistes, ainsi que des sociologues du site grenoblois. Elle accueille aussi des économistes, des juristes et des historiens.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tandemic.jpeg
Tandemic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laboratoire-pacte.jpeg
Laboratoire Pacte
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tandemic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laboratoire Pacte
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tandemic in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laboratoire Pacte in 2025.

Incident History — Tandemic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tandemic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laboratoire Pacte (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laboratoire Pacte cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tandemic.jpeg
Tandemic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laboratoire-pacte.jpeg
Laboratoire Pacte
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laboratoire Pacte company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tandemic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laboratoire Pacte company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tandemic company.

In the current year, Laboratoire Pacte company and Tandemic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laboratoire Pacte company nor Tandemic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laboratoire Pacte company nor Tandemic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laboratoire Pacte company nor Tandemic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tandemic company nor Laboratoire Pacte company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tandemic company nor Laboratoire Pacte company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laboratoire Pacte company employs more people globally than Tandemic company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tandemic nor Laboratoire Pacte holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X