Comparison Overview

Tampa Bay Partnership

VS

Center For Effective Public Policy

Tampa Bay Partnership

4300 W Cypress St, Tampa, Florida, 33607, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

The Tampa Bay Partnership is a coalition of regional business leaders, joined by a shared commitment to improving the personal and economic well-being of Tampa Bay residents. Formally incorporated in 1994, and re-established in 2016 as a regional research and public policy organization, the Partnership works with the region’s top employers, along with a diverse group of government and nonprofit partners, to identify and address the toughest challenges facing our community, including transportation, talent, racial equity and other emerging issues.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center For Effective Public Policy

10605 Concord St, Suite 440, Kensington, Maryland, US, 20895
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

CEPP is a nonprofit organization with longstanding experience in the field of criminal justice. For over 40 years, CEPP has worked collaboratively with justice system professionals and their partners to improve their justice systems and facilitate equitable, systemic, and sustainable change. We believe our criminal legal systems should work for all, and that all justice should be community justice. CEPP works on projects across the spectrum of the criminal legal system – from pretrial to sentencing, as well as corrections, probation, parole, and reintegration. Our projects focus on changing the status quo and reimagining justice solutions. We work to reduce reliance on incarceration, strengthen communities, and improve outcomes for everyone impacted by the criminal legal system. We bring expertise in group facilitation and collaboration, training and education, change management, research and national best practices, and practical working knowledge and skills in implementing evidence-based practices and sustainable programs. Over CEPP’s long history, we have worked in every state in the country, at local, state, and federal levels. When engaged with a jurisdiction, we provide structure to a deliberative process and bring lessons from empirical research and practical experience. CEPP does not dictate the solutions, but rather assists jurisdictions with crafting their own policies and practices.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tampa-bay-partnership.jpeg
Tampa Bay Partnership
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-effective-public-policy.jpeg
Center For Effective Public Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tampa Bay Partnership
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center For Effective Public Policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tampa Bay Partnership in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center For Effective Public Policy in 2025.

Incident History — Tampa Bay Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tampa Bay Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center For Effective Public Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center For Effective Public Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tampa-bay-partnership.jpeg
Tampa Bay Partnership
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-effective-public-policy.jpeg
Center For Effective Public Policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center For Effective Public Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tampa Bay Partnership company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center For Effective Public Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tampa Bay Partnership company.

In the current year, Center For Effective Public Policy company and Tampa Bay Partnership company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center For Effective Public Policy company nor Tampa Bay Partnership company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center For Effective Public Policy company nor Tampa Bay Partnership company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center For Effective Public Policy company nor Tampa Bay Partnership company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership company nor Center For Effective Public Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership company nor Center For Effective Public Policy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center For Effective Public Policy company employs more people globally than Tampa Bay Partnership company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tampa Bay Partnership nor Center For Effective Public Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H