Comparison Overview

Tampa Bay History Center

VS

The New York Historical

Tampa Bay History Center

801 Water Street, Tampa, FL, 33602, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Tampa Bay History Center takes you on a 12,000-year journey through the past, highlighting the people and stories of Florida's West Coast. With three floors of cutting-edge exhibits and theaters, the History Center offers a unique experience for visitors of all ages and provides a sense of place for long-time residents, newcomers and out-of-town guests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The New York Historical

170 Central Park West, New York, NY, US, 10024
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 700 and 749

New York’s first museum, The New York Historical is a leading cultural institution documenting over 400 years of American history through a peerless collection of art, documents, and artifacts. Our offerings span groundbreaking exhibitions; acclaimed educational programs for teachers and students nationwide; and thought-provoking conversations among leading scholars, journalists, and thinkers about the past, present, and future of the American experiment. The New York Historical is a museum of museums and a collection of collections. We are home to the Patricia D. Klingenstein Library, the Center for Women’s History, the Reiss Family Graduate Institute for Constitutional History, the Dorothy Tapper Goldman Center for Teaching Democracy, the DiMenna Children’s History Museum, and the future American LGBTQ+ Museum. We elevate the perspectives and scholarship that define the United States’ democratic heritage and challenge us all to shape our ongoing history for the better.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 310
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tampa-bay-history-center.jpeg
Tampa Bay History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-historical.jpeg
The New York Historical
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tampa Bay History Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The New York Historical
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tampa Bay History Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New York Historical in 2026.

Incident History — Tampa Bay History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tampa Bay History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The New York Historical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New York Historical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tampa-bay-history-center.jpeg
Tampa Bay History Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-historical.jpeg
The New York Historical
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tampa Bay History Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The New York Historical company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The New York Historical company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Tampa Bay History Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, The New York Historical company and Tampa Bay History Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

The New York Historical company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Tampa Bay History Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The New York Historical company nor Tampa Bay History Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The New York Historical company nor Tampa Bay History Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center company nor The New York Historical company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center company nor The New York Historical company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The New York Historical company employs more people globally than Tampa Bay History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center nor The New York Historical holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.