Comparison Overview

TallyGenicom

VS

Great Lakes Electronic Distributing

TallyGenicom

15345 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, CA, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Printronix is a leader in business-critical printing solutions, offering the most-trusted selection of ultra-reliable printers, services, supplies and parts for environments demanding top reliability and low printing costs. The company offers the two most-trusted brand names in industrial, back office and supply chain printing, Printronix and TallyGenicom, known throughout manufacturing, distribution, retail, banking, healthcare, government and other enterprises across the globe. The combined brand portfolios include the highest-quality line matrix printing solutions. TallyGenicom was acquired by Printronix in 2009. Printronix is a leading developer, manufacturer and provider of industrial and back-office enterprise printing solutions for office/industrial marketplace and distribution supply chain. Its flagship products and services integrate seamlessly into networks by delivering unequaled control, unsurpassed diagnostic capabilities and marked cost efficiency.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Great Lakes Electronic Distributing

22 James E. Casey Drive, Buffalo, NY, 14206, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded over 25 years ago, Great Lakes Electronics Distributing, Inc. (GLED) is a leading custom computer system builder. GLED makes and sells the Certera™ line of IT solutions, which include desktop computers, notebooks, servers, all-in-one pc’s, storage devices, and custom appliances. GLED is a family owned company, and their systems are proudly manufactured and serviced in the United States at GLED’s 35,000 square foot facility in Buffalo NY, which is ISO 9001:2000 certified. GLED specializes in serving the following markets: Government, Education, VAR's & Resellers, Independent Software Vendors, and Major End Users.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tallygenicom.jpeg
TallyGenicom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-lakes-electronic-distributing.jpeg
Great Lakes Electronic Distributing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TallyGenicom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Great Lakes Electronic Distributing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TallyGenicom in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Lakes Electronic Distributing in 2025.

Incident History — TallyGenicom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TallyGenicom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Great Lakes Electronic Distributing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Lakes Electronic Distributing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tallygenicom.jpeg
TallyGenicom
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-lakes-electronic-distributing.jpeg
Great Lakes Electronic Distributing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TallyGenicom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TallyGenicom company.

In the current year, Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company and TallyGenicom company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company nor TallyGenicom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company nor TallyGenicom company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company nor TallyGenicom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TallyGenicom company nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TallyGenicom company nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TallyGenicom company employs more people globally than Great Lakes Electronic Distributing company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TallyGenicom nor Great Lakes Electronic Distributing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H