Comparison Overview

Talgo

VS

Patco Industries, Inc.

Talgo

Paseo Tren Talgo, None, Las Rozas de Madrid, Community of Madrid, ES, 28290
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Talgo is a Spanish company specialized in the design and manufacture of trains and maintenance equipment, which also provides servicing to railway operators all over the world. After over 70 years, the company has become a global manufacturer of passenger trains, highly specialised in High Speed trains. At present, Talgo leads this market segment as the first provider of high speed trains in Spain whereas on a global scale it ranks among the top companies in the sector. Nowadays, Talgo trains run across countries such as Spain, Portugal, France, Switzerland, Italy, USA, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Visit us at: http://www.youtube.com/user/talgoSpain

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 1,964
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Patco Industries, Inc.

4830 52nd Avenue, KENOSHA, 53144, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Patco Industries, Inc. has been a leader in the remanufacturing of railway signal and communication equipment since 1984. We specialize in the remanufacturing of equipment including, but not limited to: all types of relays, switch machines, circuit controllers, electric locks, gate mechs, crossing bells, housing units, switch and gate motors, & spring switches.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/talgogroup.jpeg
Talgo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patco-industries.jpeg
Patco Industries, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Talgo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Patco Industries, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Talgo in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patco Industries, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Talgo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Talgo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Patco Industries, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patco Industries, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/talgogroup.jpeg
Talgo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patco-industries.jpeg
Patco Industries, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Talgo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Patco Industries, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Patco Industries, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Talgo company.

In the current year, Patco Industries, Inc. company and Talgo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Patco Industries, Inc. company nor Talgo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Patco Industries, Inc. company nor Talgo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Patco Industries, Inc. company nor Talgo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Talgo company nor Patco Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Talgo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Patco Industries, Inc. company.

Talgo company employs more people globally than Patco Industries, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Talgo nor Patco Industries, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H