Comparison Overview

Takara Belmont UK Ltd.

VS

Highgate Beds Limited

Takara Belmont UK Ltd.

1 St Andrews Way, London, GB, E33PA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.takarahairdressing.co.uk

A third-generation Japanese family business manufacturing health and beauty furniture, we have maintained a vigorous pursuit of high-functionality and continued positive contribution to good health for our futures. Applying great design, a caring ethos and the benefits of a long heritage, the company creates products to stir emotions and improve life, massage happiness and inspire loyalty.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Highgate Beds Limited

GB, WF12 1EN
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.highgatebeds.com

Highgate Beds, a northern based family run company. Established since the 70's Highgate has developed a wide range of beds based on the innovative design, excellent manufacturing and craftsmanship. The highest quality fillings and fabrics have been sourced from around the world and these together with the quality are attracting the attention of top retailers in UK, Ireland and Europe.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/takara-belmont-uk-ltd.jpeg
Takara Belmont UK Ltd.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Highgate Beds Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Takara Belmont UK Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Highgate Beds Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Takara Belmont UK Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highgate Beds Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Takara Belmont UK Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Takara Belmont UK Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Highgate Beds Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highgate Beds Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/takara-belmont-uk-ltd.jpeg
Takara Belmont UK Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Highgate Beds Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Highgate Beds Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Highgate Beds Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company.

In the current year, Highgate Beds Limited company and Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Highgate Beds Limited company nor Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Highgate Beds Limited company nor Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Highgate Beds Limited company nor Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company nor Highgate Beds Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company nor Highgate Beds Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Takara Belmont UK Ltd. company employs more people globally than Highgate Beds Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Takara Belmont UK Ltd. nor Highgate Beds Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References