Comparison Overview

Taihe Institute

VS

Australian Institute of International Affairs

Taihe Institute

23/F, ShunMaiJinZuan Plaza, A-52 Southern East Third Ring Road, Beijing, Beijing, 100022, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Taihe Institute (TI) is an independent, non-profit organization based in Beijing. Established in 2013, our mission is to provide informed analysis and opinion by way of in-depth research and be a main source of new ideas to help interested people better understand China and the rest of the world. To accomplish this mission, Taihe Institute gathers leading thinkers, intellectuals, policy and decision-makers and practitioners and encourages them to seek common values and solutions to the problems facing the global society and mankind. We aim to broaden the parameters of mutual understanding and bilateral and multilateral cooperation for better and harmonious inter-state and multi-actor relations. We undertake research into trends affecting global affairs and the international perception of China. Through in-depth analysis and expert insights, we have become a primary source of ideas and intellectual support in the creation of stronger universal ties. We focuse its research on five areas: international relations, economics and finance, science and technology, education and culture, and ethnicity and religion. As a stakeholder in managing the increasingly complex and challenging international environment, we actively collaborate with like-minded agencies and institutions. We publish our research and proposals through media partners and our internal programs, including a regular digital journal in English, the TI Observer. Major findings are published in the form of the TI Library. Taihe Institute opens its arms and offers its resources to all parties who share a vision of collective universal cooperation and peaceful coexistence.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Australian Institute of International Affairs

Stephen House, Deakin, 2600, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Australian Institute of International Affairs (AIIA) seeks to promote interest in and understanding of international affairs in Australia. It is consistently voted Australia’s “Best Independent Think Tank” and is currently Australia's top think tank in the worldwide rankings according to the University of Pennsylvania's Global Go To Think Tank Index. The institute provides a forum for discussion and debate, but does not seek to formulate its own institutional views. It arranges close to 200 lectures, seminars, workshops, conferences and other discussions each year, and sponsors research and publications. Formed in 1924, the AIIA was originally associated with the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). It was established as a federal body in 1933 and is now the only nationwide organisation of its kind in Australia. It is financed by members’ contributions, a small government subvention and tax deductible donations from individuals and businesses. The AIIA consists of independent branches located in seven Australian States and Territories (see the showcase pages), and a National Office in Canberra. Close contact is maintained with Chatham House and with similarly minded organisations around the world. Precluded by its constitution from expressing any opinion of its own on international affairs, the AIIA provides a national forum for the presentation and discussion of a wide range of views.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taiheglobalinstitute.jpeg
Taihe Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-institute-of-international-affairs.jpeg
Australian Institute of International Affairs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Taihe Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Institute of International Affairs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taihe Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Institute of International Affairs in 2025.

Incident History — Taihe Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taihe Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Institute of International Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Institute of International Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taiheglobalinstitute.jpeg
Taihe Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-institute-of-international-affairs.jpeg
Australian Institute of International Affairs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Australian Institute of International Affairs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Taihe Institute company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Institute of International Affairs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Taihe Institute company.

In the current year, Australian Institute of International Affairs company and Taihe Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Institute of International Affairs company nor Taihe Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Institute of International Affairs company nor Taihe Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Institute of International Affairs company nor Taihe Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Taihe Institute company nor Australian Institute of International Affairs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Australian Institute of International Affairs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Taihe Institute company.

Australian Institute of International Affairs company employs more people globally than Taihe Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Taihe Institute nor Australian Institute of International Affairs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X