Comparison Overview

TAFE NSW

VS

The School District of Palm Beach County

TAFE NSW

Cnr Harris St & Mary Ann St, Ultimo, New South Wales, 2007, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TAFE NSW is one of Australia's leading vocational education and training provider with over 100 years of experience. It caters for students at the local level, the national level and the international level. TAFE NSW has over 130 locations across the state. Through a series of forums, TAFE NSW works hard to ensure that it is meeting the expectations of the community and the industry in each local area. RTO: 90003

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 12,883
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

The School District of Palm Beach County

3300 Forest Hill Blvd., West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The School District of Palm Beach County is the tenth-largest school district in the nation and the fifth-largest in the state of Florida with 180 schools, serving more than 170,000 students. As the largest employer in Palm Beach County, the school district has more than 23,000 employees, including more than 13,000 teachers. Our community has more than 1.48 million residents who live, work, and enjoy the year-round beautiful weather, ocean, Intracoastal Waterway, and agricultural environment with healthy ecosystems. With world-class entertainment and tourist venues, Palm Beach County is truly a great place to live and work.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 16,629
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tafe-nsw.jpeg
TAFE NSW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/school-district-of-palm-beach-county.jpeg
The School District of Palm Beach County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TAFE NSW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The School District of Palm Beach County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TAFE NSW in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The School District of Palm Beach County in 2025.

Incident History — TAFE NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TAFE NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The School District of Palm Beach County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The School District of Palm Beach County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tafe-nsw.jpeg
TAFE NSW
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Payroll System Breach
Motivation: Financial Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/school-district-of-palm-beach-county.jpeg
The School District of Palm Beach County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The School District of Palm Beach County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TAFE NSW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TAFE NSW company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The School District of Palm Beach County company has not reported any.

In the current year, The School District of Palm Beach County company and TAFE NSW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The School District of Palm Beach County company nor TAFE NSW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TAFE NSW company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The School District of Palm Beach County company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The School District of Palm Beach County company nor TAFE NSW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TAFE NSW company nor The School District of Palm Beach County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TAFE NSW company nor The School District of Palm Beach County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The School District of Palm Beach County company employs more people globally than TAFE NSW company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TAFE NSW nor The School District of Palm Beach County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H