Comparison Overview

TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C.

VS

DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC.

TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C.

120 Wall Street, New York, NY, 10005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.twigeng.com

TWIG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C., is a full-service consulting, engineering and design group, headquartered in New York City, New York. We serve municipalities, government agencies, and private clients in the Tri-State/New York Metropolitan Area as a one-stop source for all their engineering and professional services needs. TWIG is licensed to operate in: California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC.

5670 STATE RD, CLEVELAND, OH 44134, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://diamondzengineering.com

Diamond Z Engineering is a multi-discipline engineering and consulting firm providing complete design, engineering and project management services for the petroleum, retail and food service industries. Dedicated to delivering the highest quality solutions for our customers, we handle it all, delivering forward-thinking design and engineering solutions including 2D and 3D renderings, terminal engineering, permit acquisitions, project management, image conversion, inspection and compliance services, and so much more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t.w.i.g.-consulting-engineers-p.c..jpeg
TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamond-z-engineering-inc-.jpeg
DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. in 2025.

Incident History — TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t.w.i.g.-consulting-engineers-p.c..jpeg
TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diamond-z-engineering-inc-.jpeg
DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company.

In the current year, DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company and TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company nor TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company nor TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company nor TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. company employs more people globally than TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TWIG Consulting Engineers, P.C. nor DIAMOND Z ENGINEERING, INC. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References