Comparison Overview

T Lex

VS

Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP

T Lex

105 Babcock Street, Brookline, Massachusetts, 02446, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

T Lex develops "extranets" -- private Web sites for corporations, law firms and others. Each site is customized to meet the particular needs of each client. T Lex extranets allow corporations to better manage their legal matters, law firms to better work together -- they let anyone who needs to work with others better communicate, collaborate and manage the vast amounts of information that is a part of legal matters. We offer tiered access levels so that people need only see what you want them to -- site "sponsors" typically have full access, other users may have some restrictions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP

410 - 1 Bentall Centre, Vancouver, BC, V7X 1M3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Pulver Crawford Munroe, our lawyers practice exclusively in labour and employment law. We are located in downtown Vancouver, British Columbia and act for clients throughout the province and Canada. We know the players, we know the rules, and we have decades of practical experience. Our lawyers appear regularly before labour relations boards, human rights and employment standards tribunals, arbitration boards, and other administrative tribunals. We also have experience at all court levels, including the British Columbia and Federal trial and appellate courts, and the Supreme Court of Canada. Our practice areas include: Employment Law, Human Rights, Labour Law, Privacy Law, Strategic Business Advice, and Workers Compensation. Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP provides legal services through a limited liability partnership.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t-lex.jpeg
T Lex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulver-crawford-munroe.jpeg
Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
T Lex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for T Lex in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP in 2025.

Incident History — T Lex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T Lex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/t-lex.jpeg
T Lex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulver-crawford-munroe.jpeg
Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

T Lex company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to T Lex company.

In the current year, Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company and T Lex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company nor T Lex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company nor T Lex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company nor T Lex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither T Lex company nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither T Lex company nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP company employs more people globally than T Lex company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither T Lex nor Pulver Crawford Munroe LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X