Comparison Overview

Systems Integration, Inc.

VS

Agerotec

Systems Integration, Inc.

7316 Business Pl, Arlington, 76001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Since its inception in 1992, Systems Integration, Inc. has maintained a vision of providing comprehensive technical and equipment manufacturing services with unparalleled customer support and quick response. Systems Integration has built its reputation on long-term intrinsic working relationships with its customers. Our goal is to provide practical and effective solutions for the design and implementation of state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities. As a turnkey contractor, Systems Integration employs a staff of engineers and design professionals to offer full design and construction capabilities. Systems Integration’s multi-disciplinary team provides clients with a single source for new facility construction or modernization, as well as equipment design, fabrication and installation. The Systems Integration team is available to assist its clients in evaluating their needs, and developing scopes of work and action plans while effectively guiding the project to completion with superior results and accuracy within the proposed budget.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Agerotec

undefined, New York , undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Agerotec LLC is a USA based company founded in January 2009. It aims to be a technology leader in customized membrane process optimization through its value-added advisory services, and implementation of a suite of proprietary sensing, computing, and actuating system in membrane science & technology. Agerotec is the first custom filtration specialist company of its kind to support the multi-billion dollar membrane industry.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/systems-integration-inc..jpeg
Systems Integration, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agerotec.jpeg
Agerotec
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Systems Integration, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Agerotec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Systems Integration, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agerotec in 2025.

Incident History — Systems Integration, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Systems Integration, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Agerotec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agerotec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/systems-integration-inc..jpeg
Systems Integration, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agerotec.jpeg
Agerotec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Agerotec company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Systems Integration, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Agerotec company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Systems Integration, Inc. company.

In the current year, Agerotec company and Systems Integration, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Agerotec company nor Systems Integration, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Agerotec company nor Systems Integration, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Agerotec company nor Systems Integration, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. company nor Agerotec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. company nor Agerotec company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Systems Integration, Inc. company employs more people globally than Agerotec company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Systems Integration, Inc. nor Agerotec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H