Comparison Overview

Syracuse Label

VS

Stigler Printing

Syracuse Label

200 Stewart Dr, Syracuse, New York, 13212, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nglabel.com/

Syracuse Label - A NextGen Label Group™ company provides our customers a variety of world-class label printing and packaging services to meet their brands’ objectives and requirements. This range of products includes pressure sensitive labels, flexible packaging, shrink sleeves, semi-rigid reseal labels and RFID labels. As the "Custodian of Your Brand" we focus on the Graphic, Functional, and Application requirements of your package, ensuring it delivers powerful shelf impact, as it was imagined and designed, every time. That, along with a never-ending commitment to quality and innovation makes us the label printer and packaging converter of choice for many of today’s most successful consumer brands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stigler Printing

204 S Broadway St, Stigler, Oklahoma, 74462, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stiglerprinting.com

Since our inception in 1948, Stigler Printing has been continually innovating to 'Make Printing Simple'​ for our customer base in the USA. Located in beautiful Eastern Oklahoma, we provide newspaper printing, business card printing, signage, promotional, marketing materials, business essentials and much more. At Stigler Printing, we maintain high quality standards, excellent customer service and affordable pricing. Stigler Printing has emerged as an industry leader for small and medium sized organizations, Native American Tribes, nonprofit organizations, retail businesses and government entities. With maximum customer retention, our customer care team is always willing to go an extra mile to satisfy our customers. Stigler Printing is one stop shop for all your printing needs!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/syracuse-label-&-surround-printing.jpeg
Syracuse Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stigler-printing.jpeg
Stigler Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Syracuse Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stigler Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Syracuse Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stigler Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Syracuse Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Syracuse Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stigler Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stigler Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/syracuse-label-&-surround-printing.jpeg
Syracuse Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stigler-printing.jpeg
Stigler Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stigler Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Syracuse Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stigler Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Syracuse Label company.

In the current year, Stigler Printing company and Syracuse Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stigler Printing company nor Syracuse Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stigler Printing company nor Syracuse Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stigler Printing company nor Syracuse Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Syracuse Label company nor Stigler Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Syracuse Label company nor Stigler Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Syracuse Label company employs more people globally than Stigler Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Syracuse Label nor Stigler Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References