Comparison Overview

Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER

VS

Bridge Engineering Company

Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER

100 Four Points Way, Tallahassee, Florida, 32305, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Syntech Systems, Inc. is an engineering design company, based in Tallahassee, Florida. As an innovator and early pioneer of electronic fuel management system development, we have the experience, proven product reliability and unequaled product support to best meet the needs for a dependable state-of-the-art fuel management system. Following a successful product design and development in the mid to late 1970s, we began providing the U.S. Department of Defense with fuel management systems in 1980. In response to that success, commercial sales began in 1989 with North Carolina Department of Transportation being our first significant customer. Since then, we have had success across many industries, and our FuelMaster product line is the only system accepted by all military branches of the Department of Defense. Our Engineering Department performs all product research and development of products on site, made up of a staff of 50 electrical, software and mechanical engineers, as well as Computer Science and MIS graduates. They design all printed circuit board electronics, chassis and other mechanical assemblies, power subsystems, embedded software for all our hardware devices, and a variety of Graphical User Interface (GUI) oriented systems for use on Microsoft Windows, Windows CE for the Syntech APOSD, Linux and the web. This diverse staff also includes a Test Engineering group, which assures that all items developed meet or exceed Syntech standards for quality and reliability. Research and Development is the focus of the majority of our engineers, thus placing our organization at the forefront of the electronic fuel management industry. We pride ourselves on the fact that every unit is designed, built by hand, and supported under one roof in our headquarters. From our manufacturing and quality assurance departments to our large engineering and customer support staff, maintaining our customers’ satisfaction has always been and will always be our foremost priority.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 185
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bridge Engineering Company

Behind Wazirabadi Octroi Post, Gujranwala, Punjab, 52290, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Ibrahim Group was founded in 1992 has grown to be a leading producer/supplier of materials handling products like rollers/idlers and pulleys for heavy duty belt conveyors with profound/approved quality statistics including FEED Engineering to stamp a better yard in market. The Ibrahim Group's strengths include: Family owned company with more than 20 years experience in Manufacturing and marketing of components for Materials handling industries; More than 120 employees in 2 manufacturing companies and 3 sales points; Global approach with strong presence in Pakistan, Middle East; Significant investment in own R&D, technologies and quality systems; Largest range of rollers and pulleys of any supplier globally; Strategic focus on building up local service center to support your business;

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/syn-tech-fuelmaster.jpeg
Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridge-engineering-company.jpeg
Bridge Engineering Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bridge Engineering Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridge Engineering Company in 2025.

Incident History — Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bridge Engineering Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridge Engineering Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/syn-tech-fuelmaster.jpeg
Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridge-engineering-company.jpeg
Bridge Engineering Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bridge Engineering Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bridge Engineering Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company.

In the current year, Bridge Engineering Company company and Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bridge Engineering Company company nor Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company nor Bridge Engineering Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER company employs more people globally than Bridge Engineering Company company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Syntech Systems - FUELMASTER nor Bridge Engineering Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H