Comparison Overview

Progressive Engineering Group

VS

BES Group Asset Reliability

Progressive Engineering Group

Brookhollow Ave, Baulkham Hills, New South Wales, 2153, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Progressive Engineering Group is a multi-disciplinary engineering and services provider. Together with our clients, we utilize our global platform of proven resources and industry experience to deliver innovative and cost-effective project solutions to solve modern food and beverage manufacturing challenges. We serve some of the leading domestic and international food, beverage and fast-moving consumer goods brands, with whom Progressive Engineering Group has established firm, long-term professional relationships. Clients receive solutions and innovations from a global platform which utilizes proven international, national and local resources. Progressive Engineering Group’s key offering is working hand in hand to scale up & down, to strategically prioritize & execute your capital plan across multiple projects at any given time. By doing so we enable you to recognize your return on investment. Along with that we offer a true partnership that’s integrated into your business goal & direction with future planning & forward thinking always front of mind. Our team is easily scalable & multi-location deploy-able having experience completing projects all over the world for high end food and beverage companies. We have a team of dedicated engineers & managers with global reach, decades of experience, specializing in food & beverage capital execution.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BES Group Asset Reliability

Unit 3a, Adwick Park, Manvers, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, GB, S63 5AB
Last Update: 2025-11-08

Maximising machine productivity, reducing unscheduled downtime and preventing equipment failures are critical in every industry. Unreliable equipment can lead to lost production time, expensive repair costs and compromise safety. Our unique portfolio of services, products and training are designed to save you money and confront even the toughest maintenance challenges, keeping your critical assets operating efficiently, effectively and safely. We understand that every business is different. That’s why our condition based maintenance programmes are tailored to your exact requirements and aim to deliver a maximum return on your investment – whatever your budget. From condition monitoring technologies designed to keep key equipment operating, to training packages aimed at improving the skills of your workforce, we can deliver a complete portfolio of intelligent maintenance solutions all in one place. What sets us apart from the competition is our commitment to delivering exceptional results. Our expertise, track record and heritage ensures that we deliver a first-class service to our clients by having a clear understanding of their requirements. Since 2003, we have implemented cost-effective maintenance strategies for organisations of all sizes across every major industry sector. Many of our customers have become long-term partners and trust us to deliver the best possible solution. For more information on our services, visit our website or call 01709 876712

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/symtech-international-malaysia-sdn.-bhd..jpeg
Progressive Engineering Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bes-assetreliability.jpeg
BES Group Asset Reliability
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Progressive Engineering Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BES Group Asset Reliability
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progressive Engineering Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BES Group Asset Reliability in 2025.

Incident History — Progressive Engineering Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progressive Engineering Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BES Group Asset Reliability (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BES Group Asset Reliability cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/symtech-international-malaysia-sdn.-bhd..jpeg
Progressive Engineering Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bes-assetreliability.jpeg
BES Group Asset Reliability
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BES Group Asset Reliability company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Progressive Engineering Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BES Group Asset Reliability company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Progressive Engineering Group company.

In the current year, BES Group Asset Reliability company and Progressive Engineering Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BES Group Asset Reliability company nor Progressive Engineering Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BES Group Asset Reliability company nor Progressive Engineering Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BES Group Asset Reliability company nor Progressive Engineering Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group company nor BES Group Asset Reliability company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group company nor BES Group Asset Reliability company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Progressive Engineering Group nor BES Group Asset Reliability holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H