Comparison Overview

SYMELIA

VS

Fujitsu Portugal

SYMELIA

1 rue Alessandro Volta CARQUEFOU, Pays de la Loire 44470, FR
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Société de conseil en Informatique et Partenaire Microsoft, nous aidons les entreprises à gagner en productivité et en efficacité collaborative : - Intégration des solutions Dynamics 365 CRM (Ventes / Services / Gestion de projets, Field Service) et Business Central (ERP) - Intégration et développement de solutions Collaboratives (Office 365, Sharepoint, Teams, Power Apps, Flow) - Pilotage de projets et de portefeuilles Projets (PMO) - Conseil, Assistance à Maîtrise d'ouvrage, conduite de projet et développement de solutions. Boostez le potentiel de vos équipes !

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fujitsu Portugal

Torre do Colombo Av. Colégio Militar Lisboa, PT
Last Update: 2025-04-24 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

A Fujitsu é a companhia líder japonesa de tecnologias de informação e comunicação (TIC) disponibilizando um leque completo de produtos tecnológicos, soluções e serviços. Cerca de 132.000 colaboradores da Fujitsu prestam suporte a clientes em mais de 100 países. Utilizamos a nossa experiência e o poder das TIC para moldar o futuro da sociedade com os nossos clientes. A Fujitsu Limited (TSE: 6702) apresentou receitas consolidadas de 3,9 biliões de ienes (35 mil milhões de dólares) para o ano fiscal que terminou a 31 de Março de 2020. A Fujitsu é o maior empregador japonês em Portugal, contando com mais de 2.100 Colaboradores. Com sede em Lisboa e operações no Porto e em Braga, é uma das três maiores empresas tecnológicas do mundo. Em Portugal há 40 anos, a Fujitsu trabalha com as maiores organizações dos principais sectores de actividade: Administração Pública (asseguramos a Gestão Documental em 80% dos Ministérios e o nosso Service Desk responde a mais de 10 milhões de chamadas por ano), Retalho (somos lideres e os sistemas Fujitsu são responsáveis por mais de 400 milhões de transações por ano, em mais de 500 hipermercados e supermercados), Banca (estamos em mais de 1700 balcões, prestando suporte técnico a 20.000 utilizadores), Transportes (sistemas de bilhética inteligente emitem mais de 20 milhões de bilhetes por ano e representam 250.000 horas de voo por ano). A Fujitsu apostou em Portugal para localizar um dos seus Centros de Competências que emprega mais de 1900 colaboradores de mais de 60 nacionalidades diferentes. Garantimos o suporte a mais de 750 mil utilizadores ou dispositivos espalhados pelo globo, em 22 línguas.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/symelia.jpeg
SYMELIA
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujitsuportugal.jpeg
Fujitsu Portugal
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
SYMELIA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fujitsu Portugal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SYMELIA in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujitsu Portugal in 2025.

Incident History — SYMELIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SYMELIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fujitsu Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujitsu Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/symelia.jpeg
SYMELIA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujitsuportugal.jpeg
Fujitsu Portugal
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both SYMELIA company and Fujitsu Portugal company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Fujitsu Portugal company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SYMELIA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fujitsu Portugal company and SYMELIA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fujitsu Portugal company nor SYMELIA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fujitsu Portugal company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SYMELIA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fujitsu Portugal company nor SYMELIA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SYMELIA company nor Fujitsu Portugal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Fujitsu Portugal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SYMELIA company.

Neither SYMELIA company nor Fujitsu Portugal company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in code-projects Project Monitoring System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /onlineJobSearchEngine/postjob.php. Such manipulation of the argument txtapplyto leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Other parameters might be affected as well.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.19. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/saveAutoQos. This manipulation of the argument enable causes stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.19. This affects an unknown function of the file /goform/WizardHandle. The manipulation of the argument WANT/mtuvalue results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda AC18 15.03.05.19. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /goform/AdvSetLanip. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Tenda AC8 16.03.34.06. The affected element is the function formSetServerConfig of the file /goform/SetServerConfig. Executing manipulation can lead to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X