Comparison Overview

Sydney Tools

VS

TFG (The Foschini Group)

Sydney Tools

Sydney, NSW, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Sydney Tools(ABN: 19 112 852 285) is one of Australia's leading and largest industrial tools wholesaler and retailer. Providing Australian tradies, local government, schools, police departments, The Australian Army and the general public, we source the best and biggest brands that tools have on offer, as well as bringing you all of your favourite international brands. Makita, Milwaukee, Dewalt, Hikoki, Festool, Paslode, Powerlite, Stanley, Fein, Sidchrome, these are just some of over 200 reputable brands we stock!

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 479
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

TFG (The Foschini Group)

340 Voortrekker Road, Cape Town, 7500, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

TFG holds a diversified portfolio of speciality retail assets across various product categories and consumer segments. The Group has a portfolio of 35 leading retail brands, with over 4600 outlets in 23 countries on five continents, offering customers a variety of speciality products including fashion apparel, jewellery, cosmetics, sporting apparel, electronics, homeware and furniture. TFG has the largest speciality fashion and lifestyle retail footprint in South Africa and a growing presence in the UK and Australia. With its vision to create the most remarkable omnichannel experiences for its customers, TFG has launched Bash, a lifestyle e-commerce offering, where the Group’s sought-after retail brands and loyal customers come together seamlessly in one virtual platform. Visit us at www.tfglimited.co.za

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 27,144
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sydney-tools.jpeg
Sydney Tools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foschini.jpeg
TFG (The Foschini Group)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sydney Tools
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TFG (The Foschini Group)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

Sydney Tools has 56.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TFG (The Foschini Group) in 2025.

Incident History — Sydney Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sydney Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TFG (The Foschini Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TFG (The Foschini Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sydney-tools.jpeg
Sydney Tools
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foschini.jpeg
TFG (The Foschini Group)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TFG (The Foschini Group) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sydney Tools company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sydney Tools company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TFG (The Foschini Group) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sydney Tools company has reported more cyber incidents than TFG (The Foschini Group) company.

Neither TFG (The Foschini Group) company nor Sydney Tools company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sydney Tools company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other TFG (The Foschini Group) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TFG (The Foschini Group) company nor Sydney Tools company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sydney Tools company nor TFG (The Foschini Group) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TFG (The Foschini Group) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sydney Tools company.

TFG (The Foschini Group) company employs more people globally than Sydney Tools company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sydney Tools nor TFG (The Foschini Group) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N