Comparison Overview

Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet

VS

Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum

Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet

Wharf 7, 58 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont, NSW, AU, 2009
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Sydney Heritage Fleet is a living, working museum of heritage vessels and artefacts. It also has significant collections of historic images, maps, plans and books as well as maritime research material. Founded in 1965, the Fleet has, among others, five operational heritage vessels more than 100 years old: Barque JAMES CRAIG (1874); Vice-Regal & VIP steam launch LADY HOPETOUN (1902); steam tug WARATAH (1902); schooner BOOMERANG (1903) and launch PROTEX (1908). The Fleet has its own shipyard in Sydney Harbour where its vessels are restored and maintained. Current restoration projects include coastal steamer JOHN OXLEY (1927) and Sydney Harbour ferry KANANGRA (1912). Harbour cruises, offshore sailing days, vessel inspections and on board functions are available. Full details are on the website: www.shf.org.au The Fleet is internationally recognised and has won awards for its vessels and for the work of its volunteers - around 550 of whom regularly clock up more than 100,000 volunteer hours annually.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum

2 E. 91st Street, New York, NY, 10128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-07
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the nation's design museum! Reserve your timed entry ticket at cooperhewitt.org Cooper Hewitt is America’s design museum. Inclusive, innovative and experimental, the museum’s dynamic exhibitions, education programs, master’s program, publications and online resources inspire, educate and empower people through design. An integral part of the Smithsonian Institution—the world’s largest museum and research complex—Cooper Hewitt is located on New York City’s Museum Mile in the historic, landmark Carnegie Mansion. Steward of one of the world’s most diverse and comprehensive design collections—over 210,000 objects that range from an ancient Egyptian faience cup dating to about 1100 B.C. to contemporary 3D-printed objects and digital code—Cooper Hewitt welcomes everyone to discover the importance of design and its power to change the world. Cooper Hewitt knits digital into experiences to enhance ideas, extend reach beyond museum walls, and enable greater access, personalization, experimentation and connection.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sydney-maritime-museum-ltd-trading-as-sydney-heritage-fleet.jpeg
Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cooper-hewitt-national-design-museum.jpeg
Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sydney-maritime-museum-ltd-trading-as-sydney-heritage-fleet.jpeg
Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cooper-hewitt-national-design-museum.jpeg
Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company.

In the current year, Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company and Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company nor Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company nor Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company nor Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum company employs more people globally than Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sydney Maritime Museum Ltd trading as Sydney Heritage Fleet nor Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N