Comparison Overview

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health

VS

SuperFriend

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health

833 Park East Blvd , Lafayette, 47905, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sycamorespringshealth.com

Sycamore Springs is a 48-bed psychiatric and chemical dependency facility located on a beautiful campus in the Cascada Business Park in Lafayette, Indiana. We provide inpatient and outpatient treatment services to adults suffering from the devastating effects of mental illness and/or addiction. We believe long-term recovery can be a reality. We are committed to providing an effective treatment experience and making a difference in the lives of those who seek sobriety and mental wellness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

SuperFriend

Melbourne, Victoria, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.superfriend.com.au

This is the official LinkedIn account for SuperFriend. Working with our customers, partners, providers and network, we’re helping people thrive at work. There is a recognised need to shift from raising awareness and reducing stigma to providing actionable insights that will shift the dial industry wide across mental health and wellbeing in the workplace. Through our research insights and advocacy work, SuperFriend are here to help make a positive difference in all types of workplaces across Australia. We exist to help people thrive at work, both today and tomorrow! Please note SuperFriend does not monitor this account 24/7 & we are unable to provide crisis support. Crisis support is available by calling Lifeline on 13 11 14.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sycamore-springs-hospital.jpeg
Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superfriend.jpeg
SuperFriend
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SuperFriend
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SuperFriend in 2026.

Incident History — Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SuperFriend (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SuperFriend cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sycamore-springs-hospital.jpeg
Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superfriend.jpeg
SuperFriend
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SuperFriend company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SuperFriend company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company.

In the current year, SuperFriend company and Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SuperFriend company nor Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SuperFriend company nor Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SuperFriend company nor Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company nor SuperFriend company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SuperFriend company.

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company employs more people globally than SuperFriend company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor SuperFriend holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References