Comparison Overview

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health

VS

Perception Programs

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health

833 Park East Blvd , Lafayette, 47905, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sycamorespringshealth.com

Sycamore Springs is a 48-bed psychiatric and chemical dependency facility located on a beautiful campus in the Cascada Business Park in Lafayette, Indiana. We provide inpatient and outpatient treatment services to adults suffering from the devastating effects of mental illness and/or addiction. We believe long-term recovery can be a reality. We are committed to providing an effective treatment experience and making a difference in the lives of those who seek sobriety and mental wellness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Perception Programs

842 Main St, Willimantic, Connecticut, 06226, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.perceptionprograms.org/

Since 1970, our dedicated staff has ensured accessible, culturally competent, individualized, and cost effective services for our clients and the community. We understand that each person has unique strengths and we help to build upon those strengths. By emphasizing trust, respect, confidentiality, communication, and compassion, we continuously strive to improve the quality of client care, while anticipating changing community needs. We provide group and individual treatment in both Spanish and English. We are a dynamic and responsive agency, committed to you!

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sycamore-springs-hospital.jpeg
Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perception-programs.jpeg
Perception Programs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Perception Programs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Perception Programs in 2026.

Incident History — Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Perception Programs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Perception Programs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sycamore-springs-hospital.jpeg
Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/perception-programs.jpeg
Perception Programs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Perception Programs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Perception Programs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company.

In the current year, Perception Programs company and Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Perception Programs company nor Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Perception Programs company nor Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Perception Programs company nor Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company nor Perception Programs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Perception Programs company.

Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health company employs more people globally than Perception Programs company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sycamore Springs Behavioral Health nor Perception Programs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References