Comparison Overview

Swype at Work

VS

Lincoln Financial

Swype at Work

575 8th Ave, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Swype Integrated Technologies is a payment services company with experienced professionals whose primary focus and expertise is directed towards educating clients on reducing their costs associated with accepting credit cards and integrating payments with accounting/ERP, E-commerce, Mobile and Retail/Service solutions. We are a sister company of Net@Work, a full-service technology and business consultancy headquartered in New York with 19 offices throughout the United States and Canada.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lincoln Financial

150 N. Radnor-Chester Road Radnor, PA 19087, US
Last Update: 2025-06-21 (UTC)

Lincoln Financial (NYSE: LNC) helps people to confidently plan for their version of a successful future. We focus on identifying a clear path to financial security, with products including annuities, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan services.   With our 120-year track record of expertise and integrity, millions of customers trust our solutions and service to help put their goals in reach.   Ready to take action? Visit LincolnFinancial.com.   Lincoln Financial Distributors, a broker-dealer, is the wholesale distribution organization of Lincoln Financial. Lincoln Financial is the marketing name for Lincoln National Corporation and its affiliates including The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Fort Wayne, IN, and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York, Syracuse, NY. Lincoln Financial℠ affiliates, their distributors, and their respective employees, representatives and/or insurance agents do not provide tax, accounting or legal advice.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swypeatwork.jpeg
Swype at Work
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnfinancial.jpeg
Lincoln Financial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swype at Work
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lincoln Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swype at Work in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Financial in 2025.

Incident History — Swype at Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swype at Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lincoln Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swypeatwork.jpeg
Swype at Work
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnfinancial.jpeg
Lincoln Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Swype at Work company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lincoln Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lincoln Financial company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Swype at Work company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lincoln Financial company and Swype at Work company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor Swype at Work company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Lincoln Financial company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Swype at Work company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor Swype at Work company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swype at Work company nor Lincoln Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Swype at Work company nor Lincoln Financial company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Swype at Work company nor Lincoln Financial company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Lincoln Financial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: System Configuration). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.7.9, 8.0.8.7 and 8.1.2.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Thanks Extension, Mediawiki - Growth Experiments Extension allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Mediawiki - Thanks Extension, Mediawiki - Growth Experiments Extension: from 1.43 before 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.0 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.0 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N