Comparison Overview

Swype at Work

VS

Fidelity Investments

Swype at Work

575 8th Ave, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.swype-it.com

Swype Integrated Technologies is a payment services company with experienced professionals whose primary focus and expertise is directed towards educating clients on reducing their costs associated with accepting credit cards and integrating payments with accounting/ERP, E-commerce, Mobile and Retail/Service solutions. We are a sister company of Net@Work, a full-service technology and business consultancy headquartered in New York with 19 offices throughout the United States and Canada.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fidelity Investments

245 Summer St, None, Boston, MA, US, 02210
Last Update: 2025-08-20 (UTC)
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fidelity.com

Fidelity’s mission is to strengthen the financial well-being of our customers and deliver better outcomes for the clients and businesses we serve. Fidelity’s strength comes from the scale of our diversified, market-leading financial services businesses that serve individuals, families, employers, wealth management firms, and institutions. With assets under administration of $15.0 trillion, including discretionary assets of $5.9 trillion as of March 31, 2025, we focus on meeting the unique needs of a broad and growing customer base. Privately held for 78 years, Fidelity employs more than 77,000 associates across the United States, Ireland, and India. For our Terms and Conditions, please visit http://go.fidelity.com/LIterms

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 82,941
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swypeatwork.jpeg
Swype at Work
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-investments.jpeg
Fidelity Investments
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swype at Work
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fidelity Investments
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swype at Work in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Investments in 2025.

Incident History — Swype at Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swype at Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fidelity Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swypeatwork.jpeg
Swype at Work
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-investments.jpeg
Fidelity Investments
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Third-party software vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2014
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Swype at Work company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fidelity Investments company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fidelity Investments company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Swype at Work company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fidelity Investments company and Swype at Work company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fidelity Investments company nor Swype at Work company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fidelity Investments company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Swype at Work company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fidelity Investments company nor Swype at Work company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Fidelity Investments company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Swype at Work company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fidelity Investments company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swype at Work company.

Fidelity Investments company employs more people globally than Swype at Work company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swype at Work nor Fidelity Investments holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: System Configuration). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.7.9, 8.0.8.7 and 8.1.2.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications Infrastructure. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Published
Date
2025-10-21
Updated
Date
2025-10-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Incorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Thanks Extension, Mediawiki - Growth Experiments Extension allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Mediawiki - Thanks Extension, Mediawiki - Growth Experiments Extension: from 1.43 before 1.44.

Published
Date
2025-10-21
Updated
Date
2025-10-21
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2025-10-21
Updated
Date
2025-10-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.0 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Published
Date
2025-10-21
Updated
Date
2025-10-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.0 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Published
Date
2025-10-21
Updated
Date
2025-10-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References