Comparison Overview

Swoosh Technologies

VS

G.D S.p.A.

Swoosh Technologies

15450 South Outer Forty Rd, St. Louis, Missouri, 63017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our Misson: Our mission since 2005 has been to educate our customers on design and manufacturing, with a focus on improving profitability. We offer solutions and recommendations to optimize the manufacturing process and ensure efficiency. Our Focus: We aim to enhance the design innovation process and improve the quality of product design intent by utilizing the latest technology in Siemens Product Lifecycle Management (PLM). Our expertise lies in advanced product design technology, including CAD and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). Who We Are: At Swoosh Technologies, we provide engineering solutions and services tailored to small and medium-sized discrete manufacturers. Our goal is to help these companies achieve their business objectives, such as improving quality, reducing waste, shortening cycle times, and enhancing product innovation. We take pride in delivering the right resources to our clients, exactly where they need them and when they need them.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

G.D S.p.A.

Via Battindarno 91, Bologna, undefined, 40133, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

G.D is the leading supplier of high-technology machinery for cigarette making and packing, filter production, other tobacco products and special products. Thanks to its extensive range of machines available, G.D is the only manufacturer of complete high-speed lines and of a wide range of solutions for the tobacco industry. With its headquarter in Bologna, Italy and thanks to its worldwide branches and service centers, G.D provides an extensive sales and service network to be always close to customers. G.D is part of Coesia, a group of innovation-based industrial solution companies operating globally, headquartered in Bologna, Italy.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,231
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swoosh-technologies-&-solutions.jpeg
Swoosh Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g-d-s-p-a-.jpeg
G.D S.p.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swoosh Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
G.D S.p.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swoosh Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for G.D S.p.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Swoosh Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swoosh Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — G.D S.p.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

G.D S.p.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swoosh-technologies-&-solutions.jpeg
Swoosh Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/g-d-s-p-a-.jpeg
G.D S.p.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

G.D S.p.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swoosh Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, G.D S.p.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Swoosh Technologies company.

In the current year, G.D S.p.A. company and Swoosh Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither G.D S.p.A. company nor Swoosh Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither G.D S.p.A. company nor Swoosh Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither G.D S.p.A. company nor Swoosh Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swoosh Technologies company nor G.D S.p.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

G.D S.p.A. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swoosh Technologies company.

G.D S.p.A. company employs more people globally than Swoosh Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swoosh Technologies nor G.D S.p.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H