Comparison Overview

Swoon

VS

Geiger

Swoon

7 Bell Yard, London, England, WC2A 2SJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.swooneditions.com

Established in 2012, we’re on a mission to make homes remarkable through distinctive design, beautiful craft and fair prices. Swoon is an advocate for people who believe that home is a sanctuary and has the power to physically affect our health and happiness. Our customers are stylish and savvy professionals who are time-poor but thought-rich; they demand the best out of life. We call them Hip & Humble, the obsessive creators of homes that constantly evolve with ideas that are as unique as their owners. Swoon’s business model helps to fulfil the interior desires of the Hip & Humble. Our Fast & Responsive Design Process enables us to launch new designs, initially in a small batch. And our direct-to-consumer brand, without the traditional retail overheads, ensures our designs are not only distinctive but affordable too. We use real-time sales data to test demand very quickly and then scale production on only the most popular pieces.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Geiger

6095 Fulton Industrial Boulevard SW, Atlanta, 30336, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.geigerfurniture.com

At Geiger, our commitment to craft starts with selecting the highest quality materials. Then our skilled teams shape and finish them with precision and care to create casegoods—from private office to open plan—as well as exquisite conference tables, ancillary products, and custom solutions. We’re proud to serve customers across a range of industries, working with their A+D partners to help them create statement-making spaces.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 161
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swoon-editions.jpeg
Swoon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geiger-international.jpeg
Geiger
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swoon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Geiger
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swoon in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Geiger in 2025.

Incident History — Swoon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swoon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Geiger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Geiger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swoon-editions.jpeg
Swoon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geiger-international.jpeg
Geiger
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Geiger company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swoon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Geiger company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Swoon company.

In the current year, Geiger company and Swoon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Geiger company nor Swoon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Geiger company nor Swoon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Geiger company nor Swoon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swoon company nor Geiger company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Geiger company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swoon company.

Geiger company employs more people globally than Swoon company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swoon nor Geiger holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References