Comparison Overview

Swoon

VS

EJ Victor

Swoon

7 Bell Yard, London, England, WC2A 2SJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Established in 2012, we’re on a mission to make homes remarkable through distinctive design, beautiful craft and fair prices. Swoon is an advocate for people who believe that home is a sanctuary and has the power to physically affect our health and happiness. Our customers are stylish and savvy professionals who are time-poor but thought-rich; they demand the best out of life. We call them Hip & Humble, the obsessive creators of homes that constantly evolve with ideas that are as unique as their owners. Swoon’s business model helps to fulfil the interior desires of the Hip & Humble. Our Fast & Responsive Design Process enables us to launch new designs, initially in a small batch. And our direct-to-consumer brand, without the traditional retail overheads, ensures our designs are not only distinctive but affordable too. We use real-time sales data to test demand very quickly and then scale production on only the most popular pieces.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EJ Victor

110 Wamsutta Mill Rd, Morganton, North Carolina, 28655, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

EJ Victor, recognized industry-wide for its exquisite quality, service, and value, is a locally owned, high-end furniture company located in North Carolina’s famous furniture heartland. Priding itself on the craftsmanship of devoted employees with know-how and commitment to building superior furniture, our company culture offers its customers easy access to responsible professionals who possess the information and answers that are needed. For more than thirty years, EJ Victor has built upon its own brand while also becoming a best-in-class licensing partner to premier global lifestyle brands.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swoon-editions.jpeg
Swoon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ej-victor.jpeg
EJ Victor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swoon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EJ Victor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swoon in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EJ Victor in 2025.

Incident History — Swoon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swoon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EJ Victor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EJ Victor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swoon-editions.jpeg
Swoon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ej-victor.jpeg
EJ Victor
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EJ Victor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swoon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EJ Victor company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Swoon company.

In the current year, EJ Victor company and Swoon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EJ Victor company nor Swoon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EJ Victor company nor Swoon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EJ Victor company nor Swoon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swoon company nor EJ Victor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Swoon company nor EJ Victor company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EJ Victor company employs more people globally than Swoon company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swoon nor EJ Victor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.