Comparison Overview

Switch

VS

Ferdio

Switch

4230 Avondale Ave, Dallas, Texas, 75219, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Switch is a strategic branding & interactive design studio with offices in Dallas and Oklahoma City. Our practice explores the spaces where identity, technology, aesthetic, and language meet. We design brands that move people. We are a friendly group of designers, strategists, and collaborators who believe in the power of applied curiosity and attention to detail. We design brand identities, interactive experiences, campaigns, and publications. We believe that good design is not only beautiful, but also affects how people feel and think. Our position is that “strategic branding” isn’t just a buzz word, but is instead a distinct approach to crafting perception; that’s why our team begins with research, conversations, and intimate workshops that allow us to dive deeply into our clients’ business goals, personal desires, and dreams for the future. For us, design is a way of life.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ferdio

Vesterbrogade 20, Copenhagen V, 1620, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

We are an infographic agency doing visual storytelling. We transform data and information into captivating visuals and makes it easier to understand and remember. We are visual storytellers that inform and inspires your audience. Some of our services: - Reports - SoMe visual content - Video and animation - Annual reports - Infographic websites - Presentation design - Publications - Digital dashboard design

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/switch-creative-group.jpeg
Switch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferdio.jpeg
Ferdio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Switch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ferdio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Switch in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferdio in 2025.

Incident History — Switch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Switch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ferdio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferdio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/switch-creative-group.jpeg
Switch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ferdio.jpeg
Ferdio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Switch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ferdio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ferdio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Switch company.

In the current year, Ferdio company and Switch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ferdio company nor Switch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ferdio company nor Switch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ferdio company nor Switch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Switch company nor Ferdio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Switch company nor Ferdio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Switch company employs more people globally than Ferdio company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Switch nor Ferdio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X