Comparison Overview

Swisscom

VS

HCLTech

Swisscom

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

As No. 1, we inspire people in the connected world. With the latest technologies and innovations, together we have the opportunity to shape the future. To do this, we are and act trustworthy, committed and curious. Are you with us? Join us on this exciting journey and work with us or in one of the DevOps Centres in Riga or Rotterdam in different business areas on the latest technological trends. Find out more about us and our vacancies on our careers page: www.swisscom.ch/career We look forward to hearing from you!

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 15,427
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

HCLTech

undefined, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

HCLTech is a global technology company, home to more than 220,000 people across 60 countries, delivering industry-leading capabilities centered around digital, engineering, cloud and AI, powered by a broad portfolio of technology services and products. We work with clients across all major verticals, providing industry solutions for Financial Services, Manufacturing, Life Sciences and Healthcare, Technology and Services, Telecom and Media, Retail and CPG, and Public Services. Consolidated revenues as of 12 months ending December 2024 totaled $13.8 billion. To learn how we can supercharge progress for you, visit hcltech.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 246,894
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swisscom.jpeg
Swisscom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcl-technologies.jpeg
HCLTech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swisscom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HCLTech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swisscom in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HCLTech in 2025.

Incident History — Swisscom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swisscom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HCLTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HCLTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swisscom.jpeg
Swisscom
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcl-technologies.jpeg
HCLTech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HCLTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swisscom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Swisscom company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HCLTech company has not reported any.

In the current year, HCLTech company and Swisscom company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HCLTech company nor Swisscom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Swisscom company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other HCLTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HCLTech company nor Swisscom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swisscom company nor HCLTech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HCLTech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Swisscom company.

HCLTech company employs more people globally than Swisscom company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swisscom nor HCLTech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X