Comparison Overview

Swiss Re

VS

Sedgwick

Swiss Re

Mythenquai 50/60, Zurich, Zurich, CH, 8022
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

The Swiss Re Group is a leading wholesale provider of reinsurance, insurance and other insurance-based forms of risk transfer. Dealing direct and working through brokers, its global client base consists of insurance companies, mid-to-large-sized corporations and public sector clients. From standard products to tailor-made coverage across all lines of business, Swiss Re deploys its capital strength, expertise and innovation power to enable the risk taking upon which enterprise and progress in society depend. Founded in Zurich, Switzerland, in 1863, Swiss Re serves clients through a network of over 70 offices globally and is rated "AA-"​ by Standard & Poor's, "Aa3"​ by Moody's and "A+"​ by A.M. Best. Registered shares in the Swiss Re Group holding company, Swiss Re Ltd, are listed in accordance with the Main Standard on the SIX Swiss Exchange and trade under the symbol SREN. We're smarter together. For more information about Swiss Re Group, please visit: www.swissre.com, follow us on X @SwissRe and subscribe our YouTube channel @swissretv.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 13,128
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sedgwick

US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 650 and 699

Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administration, loss adjusting, benefits administration and product recall. With over 33,000 colleagues and 10,000 clients across 80 countries, Sedgwick provides unmatched perspective, caring that counts, and solutions for the rapidly changing and complex risk landscape.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 22,216
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiss-re.jpeg
Swiss Re
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedgwick.jpeg
Sedgwick
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swiss Re
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sedgwick
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Re in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2026.

Incident History — Swiss Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swiss-re.jpeg
Swiss Re
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedgwick.jpeg
Sedgwick
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain (double extortion)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Swiss Re company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sedgwick company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sedgwick company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Swiss Re company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sedgwick company and Swiss Re company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Sedgwick company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Swiss Re company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Sedgwick company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Swiss Re company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sedgwick company nor Swiss Re company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swiss Re company nor Sedgwick company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Swiss Re company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sedgwick company.

Sedgwick company employs more people globally than Swiss Re company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swiss Re nor Sedgwick holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.