Comparison Overview

Swift Best Limited

VS

Label Logic, inc.

Swift Best Limited

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.swiftbest.com

Swift Best Limited is a printing company focused on overseas printing market. Our factory is located in Xiamen main land, a beautiful seaport city. Now it has nearly 10,000m2 self-owned workshops and more than 300 employees. We got ISO9001 certificate in 2001. Except having advanced printing machines, we provide our clients perfect service and high quality. Well communication, strictly quality control and quickly respondence are all including in our service. All requirements and advices will be passed to concerning department promptly, so that our clients can get a satisfied reply and an improved result quickly. Our production line mainly consists of books, yellow pages, wall/table calendars, brochures, catalogs, magazines, leaflets, playbills and coupons etc. With over 10 years experiences for overseas marketing, we have established good relationship - long term cooperation and win-win situation with our clients. Our clients are in Japan, New Zealand, USA, Czech Republic and Germany. Looking forward to your coming and visiting to our company

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Label Logic, inc.

516 Pine Creek Ct, Elkhart, Indiana, 46516, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.label-logic.com

Label Logic, Inc. is a National provider of labels, tags and RFID, located in Elkhart, Indiana. Since our humble beginnings in a small garage in 1997, we have continuously grown. Today, we occupy a large production facility where we produce and provide labels, tags, RFID tags, printers, ribbons, and software to a variety of industries. Label Logic recently received recognition as the 2013 Elkhart Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swift-best-limited.jpeg
Swift Best Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-logic.jpeg
Label Logic, inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swift Best Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Label Logic, inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swift Best Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Label Logic, inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Swift Best Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swift Best Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Label Logic, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Label Logic, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swift-best-limited.jpeg
Swift Best Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-logic.jpeg
Label Logic, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swift Best Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Label Logic, inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Label Logic, inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Swift Best Limited company.

In the current year, Label Logic, inc. company and Swift Best Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Label Logic, inc. company nor Swift Best Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Label Logic, inc. company nor Swift Best Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Label Logic, inc. company nor Swift Best Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swift Best Limited company nor Label Logic, inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Swift Best Limited company nor Label Logic, inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Label Logic, inc. company employs more people globally than Swift Best Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swift Best Limited nor Label Logic, inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References