Comparison Overview

Sweeney Miller Law

VS

Rhode Island Bar Association

Sweeney Miller Law

Sweeney Miller House, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR5 3JJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

From its offices in Newcastle and Sunderland, Sweeney Miller Law provides pro-active, independent, pragmatic advice to businesses and private clients across England and Wales. The partners and their team of experienced lawyers offer a wide range of legal services. The firm has developed specialist departments so that the clients’ needs are met by a lawyer with appropriate experience. Since its inception in 2002 the firm has grown from strength to strength and has developed a strong client base not just in the North East but also across the country in areas such as conveyancing, commercial property, business matters, personal injury and corporate law. The firm aims to continue to provide an unrivalled service to its existing clients whilst also attracting new clients through its reputation for providing expert legal advice, outstanding service and exceptional client care.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rhode Island Bar Association

41 Sharpe Drive, Cranston, Rhode Island 02920-4408, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Rhode Island Bar Association is a unified bar association with over 6,000 attorney members licensed to practice in Rhode Island, and is located at 41 Sharpe Drive, Cranston, Rhode Island. The Rhode Island Bar Association's LinkedIn page assumes no responsibility for opinions, statements, and facts in posts, articles, or reviews, unless the subject matter merits attention. The views expressed in any post or content do not necessarily reflect the official stance of the Rhode Island Bar Association or its members.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sweeney-miller-solicitors.jpeg
Sweeney Miller Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ri-bar-association.jpeg
Rhode Island Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sweeney Miller Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rhode Island Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sweeney Miller Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rhode Island Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — Sweeney Miller Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sweeney Miller Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rhode Island Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rhode Island Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sweeney-miller-solicitors.jpeg
Sweeney Miller Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ri-bar-association.jpeg
Rhode Island Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sweeney Miller Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rhode Island Bar Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rhode Island Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sweeney Miller Law company.

In the current year, Rhode Island Bar Association company and Sweeney Miller Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rhode Island Bar Association company nor Sweeney Miller Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rhode Island Bar Association company nor Sweeney Miller Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rhode Island Bar Association company nor Sweeney Miller Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law company nor Rhode Island Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law company nor Rhode Island Bar Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sweeney Miller Law company employs more people globally than Rhode Island Bar Association company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sweeney Miller Law nor Rhode Island Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X