Comparison Overview

SVIT

VS

Tencent

SVIT

None
Last Update: 2026-02-24
Between 750 and 799

None

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees:
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tencent

Tencent Seafront Towers, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Last Update: 2026-04-02

Tencent is a world-leading internet and technology company that develops innovative products and services to improve the quality of life of people around the world. Founded in 1998 with its headquarters in Shenzhen, China, Tencent's guiding principle is to use technology for good. Our communication and social services connect more than one billion people around the world, helping them to keep in touch with friends and family, access transportation, pay for daily necessities, and even be entertained. Tencent also publishes some of the world's most popular video games and other high-quality digital content, enriching interactive entertainment experiences for people around the globe. Tencent also offers a range of services such as cloud computing, advertising, FinTech, and other enterprise services to support our clients' digital transformation and business growth. Tencent has been listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong since 2004.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 89,363
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svit.jpeg
SVIT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tencentglobal.jpeg
Tencent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SVIT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tencent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SVIT in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tencent in 2026.

Incident History — SVIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SVIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tencent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tencent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svit.jpeg
SVIT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tencentglobal.jpeg
Tencent
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compilation of Breaches (COB)
Motivation: Credential harvesting, cybercrime, initial access brokerage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SVIT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tencent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tencent company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SVIT company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tencent company and SVIT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tencent company nor SVIT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tencent company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SVIT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tencent company nor SVIT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SVIT company nor Tencent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SVIT company nor Tencent company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tencent company employs more people globally than SVIT company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SVIT nor Tencent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H