Comparison Overview

Sviluppo Lavoro Italia

VS

Pittsburgh Food Policy Council

Sviluppo Lavoro Italia

Via Guidubaldo Del Monte, 60, Rome, Italia, IT, 00197
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Dal 1 marzo 24, Anpal Servizi diventa Sviluppo Lavoro Italia, società del Ministero del Lavoro. Il nostro compito si concentra nello sviluppo e attuazione delle politiche attive nazionali e regionali. Tra i soggetti della rete dei servizi per il lavoro ci proponiamo come “cerniera fra Stato e Regioni", interlocutore primario di Regioni e Province Autonome. Sviluppo Lavoro Italia. Insieme per il lavoro che cambia.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1,071
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pittsburgh Food Policy Council

1435 Bedford Ave, Pittsburgh, 15219, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Pittsburgh Food Policy Council (PFPC)serves as a collaborative advisory organization , bringing together stakeholders from diverse food-related sectors to examine, develop, and improve the food system of our region. The PFPC convenes food systems stakeholders and change makers to network, break down silos, invite participation in decision making and priority setting, inspire collaboration, provide leadership development and training, develop comprehensive food policy approaches, and strengthen movement building. Combining dynamic presentations, collaborative activities and networking, PFPC hosts regular meetings to connect the larger community of advocates, entrepreneurs, community members and policymakers to help coordinate the activities and policy initiatives of the Working Groups.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sviluppo-lavoro-italia.jpeg
Sviluppo Lavoro Italia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-food-policy-council.jpeg
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sviluppo Lavoro Italia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sviluppo Lavoro Italia in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittsburgh Food Policy Council in 2025.

Incident History — Sviluppo Lavoro Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sviluppo Lavoro Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pittsburgh Food Policy Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittsburgh Food Policy Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sviluppo-lavoro-italia.jpeg
Sviluppo Lavoro Italia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-food-policy-council.jpeg
Pittsburgh Food Policy Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company.

In the current year, Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company and Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company nor Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company nor Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company nor Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sviluppo Lavoro Italia company employs more people globally than Pittsburgh Food Policy Council company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sviluppo Lavoro Italia nor Pittsburgh Food Policy Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H