Comparison Overview

Svalbard Museum

VS

SS Great Britain Trust

Svalbard Museum

Vei 231-1, Longyearbyen, NO, 9170
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Svalbard Museum shall collect, preserve, disseminate and research related to cultural and natural history, environmental information and cultural preservation on Svalbard. This is fulfilled by e.g.: - Permanent and temporary exhibitions that supports the purpose - Information - Research and publication - Education - Seminars The museum receives operational funding from the Norwegian Government. We are a member of the Norwegian Museums Association and ICOM.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SS Great Britain Trust

Great Western Dockyard, Bristol, undefined, BS1 6TY, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

We are a heritage and education charity in Bristol that cares for the extraordinary 1843 ship SS Great Britain, the first modern ocean ship in the world, along with more than 70,000 historic objects and archives through our world-class conservation and education centre, the Brunel Institute. We are dedicated to inspiring engineers of the future with pioneering STEM outreach programmes, and to engaging the community and world around us through shared history and heritage. As a multi-award-winning visitor attraction on Bristol's iconic harbourside, we offer memorable experiences for all, from exciting family days out to hosting events, dinners, conferences, and even weddings aboard this piece of history. Want to get involved? Head to our ‘Support Us’ pages for information about volunteering, memberships, corporate partnerships and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svalbard-museum.jpeg
Svalbard Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ss-great-britain-trust.jpeg
SS Great Britain Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Svalbard Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SS Great Britain Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Svalbard Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SS Great Britain Trust in 2026.

Incident History — Svalbard Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Svalbard Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SS Great Britain Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SS Great Britain Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/svalbard-museum.jpeg
Svalbard Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ss-great-britain-trust.jpeg
SS Great Britain Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SS Great Britain Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Svalbard Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SS Great Britain Trust company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Svalbard Museum company.

In the current year, SS Great Britain Trust company and Svalbard Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SS Great Britain Trust company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SS Great Britain Trust company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SS Great Britain Trust company nor Svalbard Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Svalbard Museum company nor SS Great Britain Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Svalbard Museum company nor SS Great Britain Trust company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SS Great Britain Trust company employs more people globally than Svalbard Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Svalbard Museum nor SS Great Britain Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.